管理者权力对采纳建言的影响:管理者自我效能与权力距离的作用被引量：17

The Influence of Power on Voice Endorsement: Mediating Role of Managerial Self-efficacy and Moderating Role of Power Distance

下载PDF

导出

摘要员工的建言被管理者采纳,才可能真正产生积极的效果。基于权力的趋近—抑制理论以及自我效能理论,以254名管理者为样本,分析管理者权力对采纳下属建言的影响及其内在机制,可以发现管理者的权力对其采纳建言有积极影响:管理者自我效能在权力与采纳建言之间起中介作用;管理者的权力距离对于管理者自我效能与采纳建言之间的关系有调节作用,管理者的权力距离越小,管理者自我效能对采纳建言的影响越大。在此基础上构建的管理者采纳建言理论模型,有利于激发管理者采纳建言、员工有效建言。 The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of power on voice endorsement, and investigate the mediating effect of managerial self-efficacy and the moderating effect of power distance. Results based on a sample of 254 managers indicate that power has significant positive effect on voice endorsement,and the effect is mediated by managerial self-efficacy. Furthermore, the relationship between managerial selfefficacy and voice endorsement is moderated by managerial power distance. The theoretical contributions and empirical implications of this study are discussed at the end.

作者周浩

机构地区四川大学商学院

出处《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期123-131,共9页 Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基金国家自然科学基金项目"管理者纳谏行为研究:认可-实施的两阶段视角"(71472129) 四川省系统科学与企业发展研究中心重点项目"产业集群背景下企业员工工作嵌入研究"(xq15B04)

关键词权力采纳建言管理者自我效能权力距离 power voice endorsement managerial self-efficacy power distance

分类号 C931.3 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献43

1James R.Detert and Ethan R.Burris,“Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice:Is the Door Really Open,”Academy of Management Journal,Vol.50,No.4,2007,pp.869-884.
2Jian Liang,Crystal I Chien Farh and Jiing-Lih Farh,“Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice:A Two-wave Examination,”Academy of Management Journal,Vol.55,No.1,2012,pp.71-92.
3Jing Zhou and Jennifer M.George,“When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity:Encouraging the Expression of Voice,”Academy of Management Journal,Vol.44,No.4,2001,pp.682-696.
4Zvi Stern,Tal Katz-Navon and Eitan Naveh,“The Influence of Situational Learning Orientation,Autonomy,and Voice on Error Making:The Case of Resident Physicians,”Management Science,Vol.54,No.9,2008,pp.1553-1564.
5Ethan R.Burris,James R.Detert and Alexander C.Romney,“Speaking up vs.Being heard:The Dimensions of Disagreement Around and Outcomes of Employee Voice,”Organization Science,Vol.24,No.1,2013,pp.22-38.
6Elizabeth J.McC lean,Ethan R.Burris and James R.Detert,“When Does Voice Lead to Exit?It Depends on Leadership,”Academy of Management Journal,Vol.56,No.2,2013,pp.525-548.
7Elizabeth W.Morrison,“Employee Voice Behavior:Integration and Directions for Future Research,”Academy of Management Annals,Vol.5,No.1,2011,pp.373-412.
8Dacher Keltner,Deborah H.Gruenfeld and Cameron Anderson,“Power,Approach,and Inhibition,”Psychological Review,Vol.110,No.2,2003,pp.265-284.
9Wu Liu,Renhong Zhu and YongkangY ang,“I Warn You Because I Like You:Voice Behavior,Employee Identifications,and Transformational Leadership,”Leadership Quarterly,Vol.21,No.1,2010,pp.189-202.
10Wu Liu,Subrahmaniam Tangirala and Rangaraj Ramanujam,“The Relational Antecedents of Voice Targeted at Different Leaders,”Journal of Applied Psychology,Vol.98,No.5,2013,pp.841-851.