期刊文献+

检察官的不轨行为与错案防治研究——美国的考察及其借鉴 被引量:1

On Procurators' Misconducts and Preventing Miscarriages of Justice——Review and Reference from the U.S
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在美国,检察官的不轨行为是催生错案的重要原因,主要包括:隧道视野;法庭上的不端行为;对物证处理不当;不开示无罪证据;威胁、引诱证人或唆使证人作伪证;使用虚假或误导性证据;骚扰或对报告人或其辩护人表示成见、宿怨;以及在大陪审团程序中行为不端。究其原因,美国检察官的民选经历,使其更青睐严厉刑罚以获得民众支持;对抗制的诉讼模式刺激了检察官更强烈的胜诉欲;另外,缺乏多元和强有力的制裁也是导致检察官不轨行为滋生的重要原因。针对检察官的不轨行为,美国司法部门以起诉环节为中心从多方面规范检察官的诉讼行为,如引入检察官客观性义务,强化证据开示制度以及建立对检察官不轨行为的惩戒机制等。刑事错案是各国司法界共同面对的难题,美国司法从检察官视角的错案防治经验值得我国借鉴。 In the U. S,procurators' misconducts—holding tunnel vision,doing misconducts in the court,mishandling physical evidence, refusing to disclose evidence of innocence, making witness perjure by threatening,seducing or instigating, using false or misleading evidence, harassing reporters and defenders or showing feud and stereotypes to them, and misconducting in the grand jury proceeding—are the significant causes of miscarriages of justice. There are various reasons: the democratic election experience makes U. S procurators prefer severe penalties to win supports from the public,the adversary system in the U. S stokes up procurators' desire to win a lawsuit,and the lack of diverse and vigorous sanctions also contributes to the issue.For such misconducts of procurators,U. S judicial departments variously regulate procurators' behaviors while focusing on prosecution,for example,introducing obligation of justice for prosecutors,enhancing the practice of evidence discovery and setting discipline system for procurators' behaviors. Miscarriages of justice could be viewed as a common problem in the world, and the U. S experience of preventing such problem during the procuratorial tache is a valuable lesson for China.
作者 董坤
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期147-155,共9页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金 2014年国家社科基金青年项目"检察环节刑事错案成因与对策的实证研究"(14CFX023)
关键词 美国 检察官 不轨行为 错案防治 The U.S procurator misconduct preventing miscarriages of justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1张丽云.刑事错案探究——兼及证据与刑事错案之关系[J].山东警察学院学报,2009,21(2):58-64. 被引量:6
  • 2沈玉忠.美国刑事错案救济制度及对中国的启示[J].鄂州大学学报,2008,15(6):20-23. 被引量:5
  • 3吉姆·佩特罗、南希·佩特罗:《冤案何以发生:导致冤假错案的八大司法迷信》,苑宁宁、陈效等译,北京:北京大学出版社,2012年,第2-3页.
  • 4Steve Weinberg﹠Center for Public Integrity,Breaking the Rules:Who Suffers When a Prosecutor Is Cited for Misconduct?(2003),www.publicintegrity.org.
  • 5巴里·谢克、彼得·诺伊菲尔德、吉姆·德怀尔:《清白的罪犯》,黄维智译,北京:中国检察出版社,2005年,第194页.
  • 6Brady v.Maryland,373 U.S.87(1963).
  • 7United States v.Agurs,427 U.S.(1976).
  • 8United States v.Bagley,473 U.S.(1985).
  • 9Jeffrey L.Kirchmeier,Stephen R.Greenwald,Harold Reynolds,and Jonathan Sussman,Vigilante Justice:Prosecutor Misconduct in Capital Cases,Wayne Law Review Fall,2009,p.1334.
  • 10Bennett L.Gershman,“Prosecutorial Misconduct”(2nd ed.,Thompson/West,2007).Kathleen M.Ridolfi,and Maurice Possley,“Preventable Error:A Report on Prosecutorial Misconduct in California 1997-2009,”pp.36-37.

二级参考文献35

  • 1陈瑞华.英美刑事证据展示制度之比较[J].政法论坛,1998,16(6):84-95. 被引量:55
  • 2蒋石平.美国和日本刑事证据开示制度比较研究[J].政法学刊,2004,21(4):52-55. 被引量:3
  • 3朱昌波.浅析证据展示制度及其在我国的立法完善[J].吉林公安高等专科学校学报,2005,20(4):78-82. 被引量:1
  • 4[美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯著.《程序正义——向个人的分配》.邓海平译,高等教育出版社,2005年版,第202页.
  • 5Innocence Project, http://innocenceproject, org/causes/, last visited Nov. 10, 2009, (finding thirty--three of the seventy--four DNA exonerations surveyed were caused by prosecutorial misconduct).
  • 6Angela J. Davis, "American Prosecutor: Power, Discretion, and Misconduct", in 23 Crim. Just. (2008), p. 25.
  • 7Georgetown Law Journal, "Prosecutorial Misconduct", in 37 Ann. Rev. Crim. Proe. (2008), p. 590.
  • 8Warren E. Burger, "Introduction: the ABA Standards for Criminal Justice", in 12 Am. Crim. L. Rev. (1974), p. 254.
  • 9John M. Burkoff, "Prosecutorial Ethics: the Duty Not "To Strike Foul Blows"", in 53 U. Pitt. L. Rev. (1992) ,p. 275.
  • 10Berger v. U.S. , 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). (prosecutors may strike hard blows, but not foul ones. ).

共引文献30

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部