公平与惩罚价格对第三方惩罚需求的影响被引量：9

The Influence of Unfairness and Punishment Price to the Demand of Third-party Punishment

下载PDF

导出

摘要为了探讨第三方惩罚的影响因素,分析个体在不同公平情境下面临不同的惩罚成本时会采取怎样的第三方惩罚行为,本研究以171名大学生为被试,采用2×2的混合实验设计,通过设置高低两种不公平情境和3种惩罚价格,对被试的第三方惩罚需求进行实验研究。结果显示,个体的第三方惩罚需求都有随着惩罚价格的升高而降低的趋势;不公平程度显著影响第三方惩罚需求。研究表明,惩罚成本显著影响个体的第三方惩罚的实施;在低不公平情境中,被试面对不同惩罚成本时其第三方惩罚行为之间无显著差异,即各种惩罚成本下出现第三方惩罚行为的可能性均较小;而在高不公平情境中,被试面对不同惩罚成本时的第三方惩罚行为之间差异显著,惩罚成本越低出现第三方惩罚的可能性越大。 In order to explore the factors influencing the third-party punishment and analyze what kind of punitive be- havior one would take under the circumstances of unfair and prices of punishment, the present study conducted a 2×3 mixed design experiment with 171 college students as subjects to explore their demand of third-party punishment under two levels of unfairness and three levels of punitive prices. The results showed that subjects＇ demand of third-party punishment would decline with the rise of the punitive price. The degree of unfairness would significantly influence the third-party punishment. The study found that third-party punishment was signifi- cantly influenced by the punitive price. In low unfairness condition, there was no difference in third-party pun- ishment behavior between different punitive prices. The probability of the behavior was very low. In high unfair- ness condition, there was significant difference in third-party punishment behavior between different punitive prices. The lower the punitive price, the higher probability of third-party punishment behavior.

作者陈世平薄欣

机构地区天津师范大学教育科学学院

出处《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期372-376,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior

基金天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目(TJJX13-001)

关键词第三方惩罚公平价格 Third-party punishment, unfairness, price.

分类号 B849 [哲学宗教—应用心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1范良聪,刘璐,梁捷.第三方的惩罚需求:一个实验研究[J].经济研究,2013,48(5):98-111. 被引量：20
2叶航.利他行为的经济学解释[J].经济学家,2005(3):22-29. 被引量：109
3Bowles, S., & Gintis, H.(2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: Cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 65(1), 17-28.
4Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J.(2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100(6), 3531-3535.
5Charness, G., & Rabin, M.(2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817-869.
6Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U.(2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785-791.
7Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U.(2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63-87.
8Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gchter, S.(2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human nature, 13(1), 1-25.
9Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M.(1999). A Theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.
10Ottone, S.(2004). Transfers and altruistic punishments in third party punishment game experiments. Polis Working Papers.

二级参考文献67

1叶航,汪丁丁,罗卫东.作为内生偏好的利他行为及其经济学意义[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):84-94. 被引量：150
2HAMILTON. The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior[J]. American Naturalist, Vol. 97 (1963)354 -356.
3HAMILTON. The Geneticl Evolution of Social Behaviour[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biologe, Vol. 7 (1964)1 -52.
4TULLOCK. Territorial boundaries: an Economic View [ J ]. American Naturalist, 3 (1983) 121.
5WILKINSON. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat[J]. Nature, Vol. 308(1984), 181 - 184.
6AXELROD. The Evolution of Cooperation[M]. New York: Basic Books, Inc. 1984.
7道金斯.自私的基因[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1998.216113-5.
8WILSON. Sociobiologe, the New Synthesis[M]. Harvard, Belknap Press, 1975abc.
9ALEXANDER. The biology of moral systems[M]. New York: Aldine. 1987.
10GHISELIN. The economy of nature and the evolution of sex [ M ]. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1974.