期刊文献+

劝捐策略和框架效应对个体捐赠决策的影响 被引量:9

Persuasion Appeal and Framing Effect Influence Giving Decision-Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用两个3×2完全随机实验设计,考察劝捐策略和目标框架效应对个体捐赠决策的影响,结果表明:(1)劝捐策略和目标框架效应的主效应显著,信用劝捐被试捐赠更多,决策时间更短,损失目标框架比收益目标框架的被试决策时间更短,捐赠更多,被试在信用X损失框架情境中捐赠最多,反应时最短;(2)劝捐策略和框架效应的交互效应均显著,情感策略受框架效应影响较大,在损失框架下被试反应时更短,捐赠更多。 This study examined the effect of persuasion appeal and framing effect on RT and individual giving amount. A completely random designed experiment was conducted to test the hypotheses in the context of charity. Results were as follows: the main effects of persuasion appeal and framing were different. Credibility persuasion appeal raised the giving amount and shortened the decision-making more greatly than effective appeal and rational ap- peal. The negative of goal framing stimulates the giving and shortens the time for decision-making than positive framing among the subjects. The interaction effect between persuasion appeal and framing effect was significant, suggesting the affective persuasion appeal greatly influenced by froming. Giving amount rises and the time for decision-making shortens under the circumstance of negative goal framing.
作者 陈剑梅 傅琦
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期377-383,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学项目(2014SJB779)
关键词 劝捐策略 框架效应 捐赠 persuasion appeal, framing effect, giving decision.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献40

  • 1Anderson, C. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of deci- sion avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological bulle- tin, 129(l), 139 - 167.
  • 2Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1999). Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuro- science, 2, 1032 - 1037.
  • 3Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97,1447 - 1458.
  • 4Bazerman, M. (2006). Judgement in management decision making (6th ed. ). New York: Wiley.
  • 5Bazerman, M., Loewenstein, G., & White, S. B. (1992). Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (2), 220 - 240.
  • 6Bell D. E. ( 1985 ). Disappointment in decision making under uncertain- ty. Operations Research, 33, 1 - 27.
  • 7Berlin, H. , Rolls E. , & Kisehka, U. (2004). lmpulsivity, time per- ception, emotion and reinforcement sensitivity in patients with orbit- ofrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 127(5), 1108 - 1126.
  • 8Dawes, R. M., & Thaler, R. H. (,1988). Anomalies: Gooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 187 - 197.
  • 9De Vignemont, F. & Singer T. (2006). The empathic brain: how, when and why?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (10), 435 - 441.
  • 10Fehr E. , & Fischbacher U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Na- ture, 425,785 - 791.

共引文献17

同被引文献126

引证文献9

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部