虚构的争议:法教义学与社科法学争论新探

Invalid Controversy——Exploration on the Debate between Dogmatics of Law and Social Science Law

通常被认为是不可共约的法教义学和社科法学其实共享一个知识前提,即都以复杂性社会作为其推论基点。复杂性社会的具体分析范式往往体现为国家与社会二元分立和社会转型分析这两种。但中国长期以来的国家主导型的政治架构,使得国家与社会二元分立分析范式不能较好地解释当下中国社会现实,同时,在社会转型期制度建构分析中也存在着简单化、片面化的弊端。因此,基于其上的法教义学和社科法学之间的争论某种程度上并不真实。二者应该抛弃这种未经仔细审查的虚构的争议,以一种实践性的方法建构能够有效调整复杂社会的双重法学方法体系。

Actually, the Dogmatics of Law and the Social Science Law, usually considered to be incommensurable, share a premise that both disciplines base their deduction on a complex society, whose paradigm of specific analysis is often reflected by the binary separation of the state and society and the social transformation analysis. However, the long--established state--dominant politi- cal structure in China makes it difficult for the analysis paradigm of the binary separation of the state and society to explain the current social situation in China. At the same time, the analysis of the system construction during social transfor- mation tends to be too simple and one--sided. Therefore, the debate between Dogmatics of Law and Social Science Law based on these analysis paradigms is invalid to a certain extent. The two disciplines should discard this kind of false controversy without being carefully examined to construct a dual--law methodol- ogy that can effectively adjust the complex society.