期刊文献+

校车主动式安全气囊控制参数分析 被引量:3

Analysis of the new airbag control parameters for children in school bus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为弥补校车现有乘员约束系统的不足,利用经台车试验验证的MADYMO校车乘员约束系统模型,建立主动式安全气囊的仿真模型。根据气囊的工作原理,分析拉带长度、排气孔面积、气体质量流率、气囊安装位置等气囊参数对6岁儿童乘员伤害值的影响。仿真结果表明:有气囊保护时乘员头颈损伤值降低,但胸部保护效果不明显。排气孔面积变化最大可使6岁儿童乘员综合评价指标WICS(Weighted Injury Criteria for School)降低21.3%,气囊安装位置变化可使WICS最大降低11.5%。上部、中部、下部拉带可使WICS最大降低值分别为2.52%、2.23%和1.58%,气体质量流率可使WICS最大降低2.23%。由于气囊安装位置与排气孔面积对乘员的影响最为显著,气囊参数的调整可明显改善6岁儿童乘员伤害值,实现校车对6岁儿童更好的保护。 In order to tem, the active airbag compensate the deficiencies of the current school bus occupant restraint syssimulation model is established for the school bus occupant restraint system built with MADYMO which has been validated through sled test. The airbag parameters of the airbag tether length, the vent area, the mass flow rate of the gas generator, the airbag position on the of the 6-year-old child occupant are analyzed based on the operational principle of the airbag injury Simu- lation results show that: Injury of head and neck of occupant is decreased by the active airbag, but injury of chest has no notable change. The maximum decline rate of 6-year-old child comprehensive evaluation WICs( Weighted Injury Criteria for School) is 21.3% with different vent areas. With dif- ferent airbag positions, the maximum decline rate of WICs is 11.5%. The maximum decline rates of WICs are as follows: 2. 52% , 2. 23% and 1.58% by changing middle tether and the lower tether, respectively. The maximum the different mass flow of the gas. Because the influence of the the length of the upper tether, the decline rate of WICs is 2. 23% with airbag installation position and the vent area on the injury of the 6-year-old child occupant is the most significant, the injury of child occupant can be obviously improved through the prior adjustment of these parameters of the school bus to protect the 6-year-old children.
出处 《广西大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第3期666-673,共8页 Journal of Guangxi University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 中国博士后科学基金项目(2013M541607)
关键词 校车 乘员约束系统 儿童 安全气囊 参数分析 school bus occupant restraint system children airbag parameter analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1李文姬,贾立平,超载致村镇校车事故多发[N/OL].法制晚报,2014-07-14(21)[2016-01-10]http://dzb.fawan.com/html/2014-07/14/content_500402.htm.
  • 2LI Z, GE H, ZHANG J, et al. The necessity of evaluating child neck injury in frontal collision of school bus for transporta- tion safety[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 62(1): 441-449.
  • 3ELIAS J C, SULLIVAN L K, MCCRAY L B. Large school bus safety restraint evaluation[ C]//National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Amsterdam: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,2001:345-354.
  • 4ELIAS J C, SULLIVAN L K. , MCCRAY L B. Large school bus safety restraint evaluation-phase II[ C]// National High- way Traffic Safety Administration . 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Amster- dam : National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2003 : 313-323.
  • 5庄晓,侯德鹏,周满瑞,等.安全气囊装置:CNl02050072A[P].2011-05-11.
  • 6刘崇庆.汽车后排安全保护装置:CNl03332162A[P].2013-10-02.
  • 7赵会,王智,王琼,等.一种在正面碰撞工况下保护汽车后排乘员的安全气囊系统:CNl04108364A[P].2014-10-22.
  • 8卢翠,鞠春贤,蒋斌庆,岳国辉,陈现岭.正面碰撞中后排假人伤害优化[J].汽车工程师,2014(3):37-40. 被引量:2
  • 9葛如海,任美娟,赵飞,应龙.保护后排乘员安全的前排座椅参数研究[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2015,40(3):585-594. 被引量:8
  • 10葛如海,应龙,陈殉.校车用主动式儿童安全气囊装置及其控制方法:CNl03786681A[P].2014-05-14.

二级参考文献42

  • 1葛如海,臧绫,王浩涛,张学荣,陈晓东,苏清祖.汽车座椅坐垫倾角对正面碰撞乘员保护影响分析[J].机械工程学报,2009,45(11):230-234. 被引量:24
  • 2GB24407-2012,专用校车安全技术条件[S].
  • 3中国汽车技术研究中心.C-NCAP管理规则.2012年版2012年版[S].天津:中国汽车技术研究中心,201216-22.
  • 4赵三明.C-NCAP新规则需要新车进一步提高后排约束系统性能[N]中国工业报,2012.
  • 5蒋如海.汽车正面碰撞乘员约束系统匹配研究[D]镇江:江苏大学,2007.
  • 6中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴:交通事故情况(2013年)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2014:771.
  • 7ALMAHMOUD T, BARSS P. Vehicle occupant restraint systems impact on eye injuries [ J ]. Survey of Ophthalmology, 2014,59 ( 3 ) : 334-344.
  • 8GABAUER D J, GABLER H C. The effects of airbags and seatbelts on occupant injury in longitudinal barrier crashes[ J ]. Journal of Safety Research,2010,41 ( 1 ) :9-15.
  • 9SHIMAMURA M, YAMAZAKI M, FUJITA G. Method to evaluate the effect of safety belt use by rear seat passengers on the injury severity of front seat occupants [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2005,37 (1) : 5-17.
  • 10中国汽车技术研究中心.c-NCAP管理规则(2012年版)[EB/OL].2011-09-02[2015-03-26].http://www.c-ncap.orgy/rootfiles/2014/10/2012pjgc.pdf.

共引文献24

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部