期刊文献+

HGF蛋白与C-Met蛋白在胆管癌中的表达及临床意义 被引量:4

Expression and clinical significance of HGF and C-Met in cholangiocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肝细胞生长因子(HGF)与其受体(C-Met)蛋白在血清及组织中的表达及临床意义。方法采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测42例初治胆管癌患者及20例健康对照者血清HGF及C-Met水平;应用免疫组织化学技术观察42例胆管癌组织及正常组织HGF及C-Met的表达。结果术前1d胆管癌患者血清中HGF蛋白与C-Met蛋白水平均高于健康对照者(1.53±0.48)ng/mL vs.(0.48±0.55)ng/mL;(16.28±5.17)ng/mL vs.(4.31±2.84)ng/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后第3天胆管癌患者血清中HGF蛋白与C-Met蛋白水平较术前变化不明显,而术后第7、10天HGF蛋白与C-Met蛋白水平较术前则明显降低。另外,HGF蛋白与C-Met蛋白在胆管癌组织的阳性表达率分别为76.2%、81.0%,在正常组织的表达分别为15.0%、20.0%。结论 HGF蛋白与C-Met蛋白在胆管癌患者血清和组织中异常表达,可能与胆管癌的发生、发展有密切关系。 Objective To investigate the expression and clinical significance of HGF and C-Met in cholangiocarcinoma .Meth-ods The levels of HGF and C-Met were measured by ELISA ,the expression of HGF and C-Met in cholangiocarcinoma and health control was detected by immunohistochemistry .Results The preoperative levels of HGF and C-Met in cholangiocarcinoma were higher than the health control(P〈0 .05) .Compared with the preoperative state ,the levels of HGF and C-Met in cholangiocarcino-ma on the 3rd day after operation did not change significantly .However ,the levels of HGF and C-Met on the postoperative 7th and 10th day decreased obviously .In addition ,the expression of HGF and C-Met in cholangiocarcinoma was 76 .2% ,81 .0% ,respective-ly ,which is higher than that in normal tissue ( P 〈0 .01) .Conclusion There is an abnormal expression of HGF and C-Met in cholangiocarcinoma ,which may be related to the incidence and development of cholangiocarcinoma .
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第17期2362-2364,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 胆管肿瘤 肝细胞生长因子 C-MET蛋白 临床病理特征 cholangiocarcinoma hepatocyte growth factor C-Met clinical and pathological features
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1毛志远,郭晓川,张婷婷,苏丹,王李杰,白莉.影响胆管癌预后的因素研究[J].华西医学,2014,29(11):2046-2049. 被引量:9
  • 2Luo XW, Yuan L,Wang Y, et al. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical therapy for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma:a large Single- Center cohort study[J]. Gastrointesti Surg, 2014,18 (3) : 562-572.
  • 3Graziano F, Catalano V, Lorenzini P, et al. Clinical impact of the HGF/Met pathway activation in patients with ad- vanced gastric cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy [J]. Pharmaeogenomics J,2014,14(5) :418-423.
  • 4Sano Y, Hashimoto E,Nakatani N,et al. Combining onar- tuzumab with erlotinib Inhibits growth of non sma[I ceillung cancer with activating EGFR mutations and HGF overexpression[J]. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 2014, 14(2) : 533-541.
  • 5盖大伟,宋明芮,刘涛,焦作义,李玉民.胆管癌的诊疗现状[J].现代生物医学进展,2015,15(2):368-372. 被引量:3
  • 6Leelawat K, Leelawat S, Tepaksorn P, et al. Involvement of c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor pathway in cholangio- carcinoma cell invasion and its therapeutic inhibition with small interfering RNA specific for C-Met[J]. J Surg Res, 2006,136 (1) : 78-84.
  • 7Braconi C, Valeri N, Gasparini P, et al. Transcribed ultra- conserved regions are aberrantly expressed and can be modulated by interleukin 6 in cholangiocarcinoma [J]. Lancet,2013 ,Supple 1:26.
  • 8黄志强.肝胆管外科的发展方向[J].外科理论与实践,2011,16(4):329-331. 被引量:28
  • 9Patel T. New insights into the molecular pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[ J ]. J GastroenteroI, 2014,49(2) : 165-172.
  • 10Seiwert TY,Beck TN,Salgia R. The role of HGF/c MET in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[M]//molecu- lar determinants of head and neck cancer. Springer New York, 2014 : 91-111.

二级参考文献59

  • 1陈中,晏建军,黄亮,吴孟超,严以群.肝内胆管细胞癌预后因素分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2006,12(10):654-656. 被引量:12
  • 2Charbel H, A1-Kawas F H. Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and diagnosis[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2011, 13(2): 182-187.
  • 3Fabris L, Alvaro D. The prognosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after radical treatments[J]. Hepatology, 2012, 56(3): 800-802.
  • 4Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbidity and mortality[J]. J Hepatobiliary Panereat Sei, 2010, 17(4): 455-462.
  • 5Farges O, Fuks D, Le Treut Y P, et al. AJCC 7th edition of TNM staging accurately discriminates outcomes of patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: By the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group[J]. Cancer, 2011, 117(10): 2170-2177.
  • 6Charbel H, A1-Kawas F H. Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and diagnosis[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep,2011, 13(2): 182-187.
  • 7Gatto M, Alvaro D. Cholangiocarcinoma: risk factors and clinical presentation[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2010, 14(4): 363-367.
  • 8Li C, Wang W, Ding H, et al. Value of contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2011, 39(8): 447-453.
  • 9Foley W D, Quiroz F A. The role of sonography in imaging of the biliary tract[J]. Ultrasound Q, 2007, 23(2): 123-135.
  • 10Matsusaki S, Kikuyama M, Kawakami H, et al. Clinical features and CT findings in the differential diagnosis of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma [J]. Nihon Shokakibyo GakkaiZasshi, 2013, 110(4): 615-621.

共引文献37

同被引文献67

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部