期刊文献+

律师分级执业的制度分析 被引量:3

An Institutional Analysis of the Lawyer's Practicing Law by Ranking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 酝酿中的律师等级评定和分级执业,将"规范律师服务市场"和"提高律师执业能力"定为目标。但制度分析表明,该措施很有可能混淆市场竞争与政府管制的长处和短处,将会干扰法律服务市场中的资源配置,阻碍律师的职业上升通道,扭曲"以质论价"的价格形成机制,并且在很大程度上加重了在高级别法院进行诉讼的当事人的经济负担,甚至还会导致其因此而无法获得原本有机会得到的法律服务质量。 Lawyer rating and practicing law by ranking that are under discussion aim at "regulating the market of the lawyer service"and "improving the practicing ability of the lawyer". However,an institutional analysis reveals that this policy may confuse advantages and disadvantages of both market competition and government regulation. While interfering with resource allocation in the market of law service and hindering the approaches to the lawyer's career promotion,it will also distort the price-forming mechanism of "pricing by quality". To a large extent,it increases the economic burden of the litigants who sue in the higher courts,and even causes them to lose the law service quality that they should have had the opportunities to acquire.
作者 黄永锋
出处 《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第3期108-114,共7页 Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
关键词 律师等级制 分级执业 市场竞争 政府管制 rating system of the lawyer practicing law by ranking market competition government regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1陈卫东教授、王兆峰律师对话律师分级制度改革[EB/OL].[2015-11-24].http://finance.sina.com.cn/sf/news/2015-11-24/163611531.html.
  • 2魏徽徽.明年或推进律师等级制改革[N].信息时报,2015-11-17(A14).
  • 3任重远.激辩律师分级出庭[N].南方周末,2015-12-03(A6).
  • 4Adam Smith. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the WeaLth of Nations[ M ]. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. , 1930:15 -23.
  • 5黎思复 黎庭弼 译.霍布斯·利维坦[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985.117.
  • 6Ronald H Coase. The Nature of the Firm, Economica[J]. New Series,1937,4(16) :386 -405.
  • 7约翰·密尔.论自由[M].程崇华译.北京:商务印书馆,1959.
  • 8Steven N S Cheung. The Theory of Price Control[ J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1974,17 ( 1 ) :53 - 71.

共引文献71

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部