期刊文献+

从语义学到心灵哲学:重思对阿奎那关于理智之非物质性论证的一些批评

From Semantics to the Philosophy of Mind:Reconsidering Some Late-Medieval and Modern Critiques of Aquinas' Argument for the Immateriality of the Intellect from the Universality of Concepts
原文传递
导出
摘要 阿奎那关于个别感觉与普遍理性表征的理论是其对理智之非物质性论证的关键部分,但这一理论受到司各特、奥卡姆及布里丹等后来者的批评。然而,这些批评其实都不能成立。阿奎那的论证并不像罗伯特·帕斯纳奥对他的诘难中所说的那样,犯了从一个表征的语义内容推出此表征之本体论属性的"内容谬误"。此外,由布里丹本人的评论可以看出,布里丹实际上不得不接受他所批评的阿奎那论证所蕴含的主要内容。 Aquinas' account of singular sensory and universal intellectual representation is crucialin one of his main arguments for the immateriality of the intellect. However,it had beenchallenged by Scotus,Ockham and Buridan.I argue that their objections to Aquinas' account areuntenable.I also show that,contrary to what Robert Pasnau claims,Aquinas' argument does nothave to commit ″the content fallacy.″ Finally,I explain why Buridan has to accept the mainimplication of Aquinas' argument,even though he actually rejects that implication.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期61-68,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 阿奎那 语义学 心灵哲学 个别感觉 普遍理性 非物质性 Aquinas semantics philosophy of mind singular sensory universal intellect immateriality
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1T. Auquinas, Summa Theologiae 1, q. 85 a. 3 co, in S. Thomae de Aquino, Opera Omnia, http://www, corpusthomisticum, org/ iopera, html.
  • 2D. Scotus, Ordinatio II , d. 3, p. 1, q. 1, nn. 20 - 21, in Opera Omnia (HThe Vatican edition") , Civitas Vatieana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1950.
  • 3W. Ockham, Quodlibeta Septem I , q. 13, in J. C. Wey C. S. B. (ed.), Guillelmi de Ockham Opera Theologlca : Vol. 9, St. Bonaventure, NY; St. Bonaventure University, Franciscan Institute, 1980.
  • 4J. Buridan, Quaestiones in De Anima, lb. 3, q. 8, in J. A. Zupko(ed. - tr. ),"John Buridan's Philosophy of Mind: An Edition and Translation of Book In of His 'Questions on Aristotle's De anima'(Third Redaction), with Commentary and Critical and Interpretative Essays," Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, 1989, pp. 183 -221.
  • 5T. Aquinas, Scripture super Sententiis, lb. 2, d. 19, q. 1,a. 1, in S. Thomae de Aquirxo, Opera Omnia, http://www. corpuathomisticum, org/iopera, html.
  • 6T. yon Sutton, Quodlibeta I, q. 2], edited by M. Sehmaus & M. Gonztilez-Haba, Mtinchen: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1969.
  • 7T. von Sutton, QuaestionesOrdinariae, q. 18, ad 21, ad 26, edited by J. Schneider, Mttnchen: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissensehaften, 1977.
  • 8J. Buridan, Quaestiones in De Anima, lb. II , q. 13, in P. G. Sobol(ed. ),"John Buridan on the Soul and Sensation: An Edition of Book lI of His Commentary on Aristotle's Book of the Soul, with an Introduction and a Translation of Question 18 on Sensible Species," Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, 1984.
  • 9R. Pasnau,"Aquinas and the Content Fallacy," Modern Schoolman, Vol. 75(1998), pp. 293 - 314.
  • 10G. Klima, John Buridan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部