摘要
《奏永宁宫》虽署名司马孚,但非司马孚所作。《奏永宁宫》翔实的历史记录,弥补了《三国志》对曹芳生活事件记述的不足,具有重要的史料文献价值。《奏永宁宫》与汉魏以来的奏议文相比,在写作体式上存在很大差异,名为奏议,实为弹事,是奏议文向弹事文转变的重要环节。其独特的书写体式保存了早期弹事文的写作风格,是考察魏晋南北朝弹事文演变的重要凭借,具有重要的文体史价值和意义。
Memorials to the Yongning Palace,though signed by Sima Fu,was not written by him. With detailed historical records,Memorials to the Yongning Palace makes up for the lack of account on Cao Fang's life events in " Three Kingdoms" and has important value of historical documents. Compared with Zouyi articles since Han and Wei Dynasties,Memorials to the Yongning Palace has a big difference in the writing style. It is an actual Tanshi article instead of Zouyi article. It is also an important part of zouyi article's transformation to Tanshi. Its unique writing style has preserved the early writing style of Tanshi articles,which is an important way to study the evolution of the literary and writing in the Wei,Jin and the southern and Northern Dynasties.
出处
《许昌学院学报》
CAS
2016年第3期28-32,共5页
Journal of Xuchang University
关键词
司马孚
《奏永宁宫》
奏议文
弹事文
Sima fu
Memorials to the Yongning Palace
Zouyi article
Tanshi article
literary stylistic and historical value