期刊文献+

建架理论下的渐减指导

Diminishing Coaching Based on Scaffolding Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 梅里尔教授在阐述其著名的"首要教学原理"时提出了"渐减指导"的教学策略,而建架理论则基于瑞士心理学家皮亚杰的构建主义理论和俄国心理学家维果斯基的"最近发展区"理论。这两种理论在实际教学中经常被单独使用,也取得了一定的教学效果。创造性地将建架理论与渐减指导结合起来,分析了二者融合后对教学带来的意义和影响。同时对现行的教育理念提出了看法,试图为培养学生自主学习能力提供新的教学策略,也对未来的人才培养方向进行了思考。 M·David Merrill presents a new teaching strategy:diminishing coaching while elaborating his famous 'First Principles of Instruction'.Scaffolding theory is based on Construction Theory of Swiss psychologist J.Piaget and Zone of Proximal Development Theory of Russian psychologist L.Vygotsky.These two theories are often applied respectively in practical teaching with some effects.This paper initially integrates scaffolding theory with diminishing coaching together,analyses the significance and teaching effects of the new integration and reflects on the present educational concept in hope of being helpful to promote students' autonomous learning as well as providing reference for the future talents cultivation.
作者 邹灿 王劲
出处 《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第5期123-126,共4页 Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金 2014-2015年度成都理工大学外国语学院教改项目"大学英语‘通识+应用能力培养’创新教学模式研究" 2014-2016年度成都理工大学外国语学院"大学英语艺体及专科教学团队"
关键词 建架理论 渐减指导 融合 自主学习 scaffolding instruction diminishing coaching integration autonomous learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1张建伟,陈琦.简论建构性学习和教学[J].教育研究,1999,20(5):56-60. 被引量:287
  • 2高文,王海燕.抛锚式教学模式(二)[J].全球教育展望,1998,28(4):31-35. 被引量:59
  • 3范琳.认知方式差异与外语的因材施教[J].外语教学,2002,23(2):83-88. 被引量:96
  • 4Driver, R. Theory into Practice: A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development [A]. In P. Fensham(ed. ). Development and Dilemmas in Science Education. London: Falmer Press, 1998.
  • 5Hatano, G. Time to Merge Vygotskian and Constructivist Conception of Knowledge Acquisition [ A]. In Forman, E. A., Minick, N. & Stone,C. A. ( eds. ) . Contexts for Learning: Socialcultural Dynamics in Children's Development (pp.153- 166). Oxford: Oxford University Press,1993.
  • 6Jonassen, D. et al.. Constructivism and Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Education [J]. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1995 (2).
  • 7Phillips, D. C. 1996. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism [J]. Educational Researcher, 1996 (7): 5- 12.
  • 8Spior, R.J. et al.. Constructive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition for Ill-structured Domain [A]. In T.M. Duffy and D.H.Jonassen (eds.).Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation ( pp57 -75). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. ,1991.
  • 9傅维利 王维荣.关于行为主义与建构主义教学观及师生角色比较与评价[J].教育科学,2001,(1).
  • 10Duffy, T. M. & D. H. Jonassen. Constructivism: New Implications for Instructional Technology [J]. Educational Technology, 1991, 31(5): 7-12.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部