期刊文献+

著作权商业维权案件审判引发的版权交易制度完善的思考 被引量:6

Reflection on the Perfection of the Copyright Trading System Caused by the Commercial Rights Maintenance Case Trials of Copyright
下载PDF
导出
摘要 著作权商业维权案件近年来呈蜂拥之势,但著作权商业维权案件的商业逐利性,不仅偏离了知识产权的维权方向,对版权行业健康发展不利,也占用了有限的司法资源。著作权商业维权案件频发的诱因很多,版权交易平台的未能及时跟进是一重要因素。法院在审理著作权商业维权案件时,除了要积极妥善处理维权纷争、维护当事人合法权利,还应意识到版权交易市场著作权的正常流转是从正面防范著作权商业维权案件频发的重要保障,应逐步完善《著作权法》相关规定,细化版权交易各项制度,建立版权交易信息共享系统,以版权交易平台建构并不断发展的视角减少著作权商业维权案件的发生,维护著作权人的合法权益。 In recent years,the number of the commercial rights maintenance cases of copyright have experienced a rapid growth.However,their pursuing the benefits not only make them deviate the direction of protecting intellectual property right and do harm to the healthy developing of copyright industry,but also take up limited judicial resources.There are many reasons for the frequent occurrence of the commercial rights maintenance cases,an important factor is that copyright trading platform failed to follow up in time.When courts judging commercial rights maintenance cases,they should realize that the normal circulation of copyright trading market is an important guarantee to decrease the number of the commercial rights maintenance cases in addition to handle rights protecting conflict actively and properly and to safeguard the legitimate rights of the parties.And it is important to perfect concerned regulation of Copyright Law,make all rules of copyright trading as detailed,set up an information sharing system of copyright trading.They should reduce the number of commercial rights maintenance cases and protect the legitimate rights of copyright owners from the perspective of the constructing and continuing developments of copyright trading platform.
出处 《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第4期40-45,共6页 Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金 江西省十二五社科规划项目"文化产权交易法律体系建构研究"(14FX04)
关键词 著作权 商业维权 案件审判 版权交易 copyright the commercial rights maintenance case trial copyright trading
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献55

  • 1张平.数字图书馆版权纠纷及授权模式探讨[J].法律适用,2010(1):40-42. 被引量:23
  • 2Yochai Benkler, From Consumers to Users. Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Towards Sustainable Commons and User Access, 52 Fed. Comm. I~ J. 561,562(2000).
  • 3Robert P. Merges, The Concept of Property in the Digital Age, 45 Hous. L. Rev. 1239,1274 -1275(2008).
  • 4Severine Dusollier, Sharing Access to Intellectual Property through Private Ordering, 82 Chi -Kent L. Rev. 1391,1392 -1393 (2007).
  • 5Lydia Pallas Loren, Slaying the Leather - Winged Demons in the Night . Reforming Copyright Owner Contracting with Clickwrap Misuse, 30 Ohio N. U. L. Rev. 495,496-499(2004).
  • 6Edward Lee, Warming Up to User-Generated Content, 2008 Ⅲ. Ill. L. Rev. 1459,1460(2008).
  • 7ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, 86 F. 3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996) ; MDY Indus v. Blizzard Entm' t, 629 F. 3d 928 (9th Cir. 2010).
  • 8“北京-中院民事判决书(2006)-中民初字第14468号”.
  • 9"北京-中院民事判决书(2011)-中民终字第5969号".
  • 10Stephen E. Siwek, Copyright Industries in the U. S. Economy (2011), International Intellectual Property Alliance, p. 8.

引证文献6

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部