在“大道和生学”与德国观念论之间——兼论中西哲学的内容与方法差异

Between “Dadaohesheng Study” and German Idealism: Contrast of Chinese and Western Philosophy in Content and Method

钱耕森先生于20世纪末提出了"大道和生学",继承了传统中国哲学中从史伯开始,直到老子、孔子的"和"的哲学思想。而在西方哲学中,尤其在德国观念论中,黑格尔在《精神现象学》等著作中对于谢林的批判最终确立了"斗"的哲学的绝对地位。这看似矛盾,实际上在全球化视野中,我们无论支持中国哲学,批判西方哲学,还是支持西方哲学,批判中国哲学,实际上都是中西学者相互冲突,相互交往的不同表现,从理论上都是能够自圆其说的。

At the end of 20 ^(th) Century, the contemporary Chinese philosopher Qian Gengsen put forward his 'dadaohesheng study' which inherited the thought of 'harmony' of traditional Chinese philosophy from Shi Bo to Lao Zi and Confucius. However, in the western philosophy, especially in German idealism, Hegel's critique to Schelling in the Phenomenology of Spirit and other works eventually established the sheer status of 'fighting' in philosophy. Thought it seemed to be a paradox, from the perspective of globalization, the different performance of conflict and interaction between Chinese and Western scholars are both reasonable in the theory whether we support Chinese philosophy to criticize western philosophy or vice versa.