论环境公益诉讼原告资格的类型

Types of Plaintiff Qualification on Environmental Public Interest Litigation

环境公益诉讼在我国随着人们对环境问题的日益重视而备受关注,但现行法律对环境公益诉讼的原告资格尚未有清晰明确的界定。文章通过对检察机关、有关组织、公民个人等不同主体进行分析,并结合司法实践的具体案例,尝试构建一种较为理性的环境公益诉讼的原告资格模式:建议检察机关不宜作为环境公益诉讼的原告直接起诉,而作为法律监督机关支持起诉;对于有关组织的界定,应适当予以放宽,不作法律上的强制性规定,而是由市场自由协调发展,符合合法身份的社会组织都具备环境公益诉讼的原告资格;应赋予公民个人的原告资格,并对其诉讼予以法律保护;可设置对环境公益诉讼主体分享诉讼成功后的收益,或由政府给予一定的奖励或补贴机制。

Environmental public interest litigation in our country has been attached more importance,but there is no specific classification for in the current law on environmental public interest litigation. This article tries to construct a rational mode for plaintiff qualification: firstly,procuratorial organs should not be taken as an accuser to prosecute directly,as legal supervision organs to support the prosecution instead; secondly,as for some related organizations,it should be developed with the market,instead of mandatory provisions from the law,and all the social organizations with legal identities can be of the plaintiff qualification; thirdly,individual citizens should be granted plaintiff qualification,and be offered legal protection at the same time. It is advisable to award these subjects of litigation after the success,or some allowance to them.