2Simson E,Groner W.The state of the art for theautomated WBC differential[J].Lab Hematol,1995,1(1):13-22.
3Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Referenceleukocyte(WBC)differential count(proportional)and evaluation of instrumental methods;approvedstandard-second edition[S].H20-2A,CLSI,2007.
4Kratz A,Bengtsson HI,Casey JE,et al.Performanceevaluation of the CellaVision DM96 system:WBCdifferentials by automated digital image analysissupported by an artificial neural network[J].Am JClin Pathol,2005,124(5):770-781.
5Briggs C,Longair I,Slavik M,et al.Can automatedblood film analysis replace the manual differential?Anevaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated imageanalysis system[J].Int J Lab Hematol,2009,31(1):48-60.
6Koepke JA.A delineation of performance criteria forthe differentiation of leukocytes[J].Am J ClinPathol,1977,68(1 Suppl):202-206.
7Ceelie H,Dinkelaar RB,Van Gelder W.Examinationof peripheral blood films using automated microscopy;evaluation of Diffmaster Octavia and Cellavision DM96[J].J Clin Pathol,2007,60(1):72-79.
8Koepke JA,Dotson MA,Shifman MA.A criticalevaluation of the manual/visual differential leukocytecounting method[J].Blood Cells,1985,11(2):173-186.
9International Society for Laboratory Hematology.Consensusguidelines:positive smear findings[EB/OL].(2010-02-25)[2011-08-08].http://www.islh.org/web/index.php?page=consensus_smear.
