摘要
从甘振波先生的商榷意见可看出,作者对《金瓶梅词话》中的语言材料不熟悉,如对多次出现的"临期"毫无所知,错误地认为明代已有铰链等,故文章缺乏基本说服力。
This article argues that Mr. Gan Zhenbo is not very familiar with the language materials in Cihua Version of The Golden Lotus,which can be observed from his previous statements and suggestions.For example,in his article,he didn't even mention the high-frequency word 'Lin Qi' in Cihua Version of The Golden Lotus,and claimed that the word 'Jiao Lian' first appeared in the Ming Dynasty and so on,thus making his article unconvincing.
出处
《河南理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第2期226-229,共4页
Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Social Sciences
关键词
《金瓶梅词话》
吴语词'吴语语音
书证
Cihua Version of The Golden Lotus
words of Wu dialect
pronunciation of Wu dialect
documentary evidence