期刊文献+

Determinants of Detection of Stones and Calcifications in the Hepatobiliary System on Virtual Nonenhanced Dual-energy CT 被引量:1

Determinants of Detection of Stones and Calcifications in the Hepatobiliary System on Virtual Nonenhanced Dual-energy CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective To retrospectively determine the features of stones and calcifications in hepatobiliary system on virtual nonenhanced(VNE) dual-energy computed tomography(CT), and to evaluate the possibility of VNE images in diagnosis for those lesions. Methods A total of 128 gall stones and calcifications of the liver found in 110 patients were examined with triple phase abdominal CT scan from July 2007 to December 2011, in which true nonenhanced(TNE) phase and arterial phase were performed with single-energy CT(120 kVp) and portal venous phase was performed with dual-energy CT(100 kVp and 140 kVp). VNE images were generated from the portal venous phase dual-energy CT data sets by using commercially VNC software. The mean CT values for the stone, liver, bile and paraspinal muscle, mean lesion density and size in area dimension, contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR) of lesion to the liver or bile, and image noise were assessed and compared between VNE and TNE images. The effective dose and size-specific dose estimate(SSDE) were also calculated. Results The mean CT values of the lesions measured on VNE images declined significantly compared with those measured on TNE images(164.51±102.13 vs. 290.72±197.80 HU, P<0.001), so did the lesion-to-liver CNR(10.80±11.82 vs.18.81±17.06, P<0.001) and the lesion-to-bile CNR(17.24±14.41 vs. 21.32±17.31, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in size of lesions area between VNE and TNE images(0.69±0.88 vs. 0.72±0.85 cm2, P=0.062). Compared to the 128 lesions found in TNE images, VNE images showed the same density in 30(23.4%) lesions, lighter density in 88(68.8%) lesions, while failed to show 10(7.8%) lesions, and showed the same size in 61(47.7%) lesions and smaller size in 57(44.5%)lesions. The CT cutoff values of lesion and size were 229.21 HU and 0.15 cm2, respectively. The total effective dose for triple phase scan protocol with TNE images was 19.51±7.03 mS v, and the SSDE was 39.84±11.10 mGy. The effective dose for dual phase scan protocol with VNE images instead of TNE images was 13.29±4.89 m Sv, and the SSDE was 27.83±9.99 mGy. Compared with TNE images, the effective dose and SSDE of VNE images were down by 32.05%±3.69 % and 30.63%±2.34 %, respectively. Conclusions Although the CT values and CNR of the lesions decreased in VNE images, the lesions of which attenuation greater than 229.21 HU and size larger than 0.15 cm^2 could be detected with good reliability and obvious dose reduction. There was good consistency in the size of stones and calcifications in hepatobiliary system between VNE images and TNE images, which ensured the possibility of the clinical application of VNE images. Objective To retrospectively determine the features of stones and calcifications in hepatobiliary system on virtual nonenhanced (VNE) dual-energy computed tomography (CT), and to evaluate the possibility of VNE images in diagnosis for those lesions. Methods A total of 128 gall stones and calcifications of the liver found in 110 patients were examined with triple phase abdominal CT scan from July 2007 to December 2011, in which true nonenhanced (TNE) phase and arterial phase were performed with single-energy CT (120 kVp) and portal venous phase was performed with dual-energy CT (100 kVp and 140 kVp). VNE images were generated from the portal venous phase dual-energy CT data sets by using commercially VNC software. The mean CT values for the stone, liver, bile and paraspinal muscle, mean lesion density and size in area dimension, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of lesion to the liver or bile, and image noise were assessed and compared between VNE and TNE images. The effective dose and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were also calculated. Results The mean CT values of the lesions measured on VNE images declined significantly compared with those measured on TNE images (164.51±102.13vs. 290.72±197.80 HU,P<0.001), so did the lesion-to-liver CNR (10.80±11.82vs.18.81±17.06,P<0.001) and the lesion-to-bile CNR (17.24±14.41 vs. 21.32±17.31,P<0.001). There was no significant difference in size of lesions area between VNE and TNE images (0.69±0.88vs.0.72±0.85 cm2,P=0.062). Compared to the 128 lesions found in TNE images, VNE images showed the same density in 30 (23.4%) lesions, lighter density in 88 (68.8%) lesions, while failed to show 10 (7.8%) lesions, and showed the same size in 61 (47.7%) lesions and smaller size in 57 (44.5%)&nbsp;lesions. The CT cutoff values of lesion and size were 229.21 HU and 0.15 cm2, respectively. The total effective dose for triple phase scan protocol with TNE images was 19.51±7.03 mSv, and the SSDE was 39.84±11.10 mGy. The effective dose for dual phase scan protocol with VNE images instead of TNE images was 13.29±4.89 mSv, and the SSDE was 27.83±9.99 mGy. Compared with TNE images, the effective dose and SSDE of VNE images were down by 32.05%±3.69 % and 30.63%±2.34 %, respectively. Conclusions Although the CT values and CNR of the lesions decreased in VNE images, the lesions of which attenuation greater than 229.21 HU and size larger than 0.15 cm2could be detected with good reliability and obvious dose reduction. There was good consistency in the size of stones and calcifications in hepatobiliary system between VNE images and TNE images, which ensured the possibility of the clinical application of VNE images.
出处 《Chinese Medical Sciences Journal》 CAS CSCD 2016年第2期76-82,共7页 中国医学科学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Health Industry Special Scientific Research Project(201402019)
关键词 VIRTUAL non-enhanced STONE CALCIFICATION HEPATOBILIARY system DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED tomographyvirtual non-enhanced STONE CALCIFICATION HEPATOBILIARY system DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED tomography virtual non-enhanced stone calcification hepatobiliary system dual-energy computed tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Buffet C. Gallstones. Epidemiology, physiopathology,diagnosis, treatment. Rev Prat 2000; 50:1953-7.
  • 2Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology ofgallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2010; 39:157-69.
  • 3Zeng Q, He Y, Qiang DC, et al. Prevalence andepidemiological pattern of gallstones in urban residentsin China. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24:1459-60.
  • 4Hamdani NH, Qadri SK, Aggarwalla R, et al. Clinicopathologicalstudy of gall bladder carcinoma with specialreference to gallstones: our 8-year experience fromeastern India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012; 13:5613-7.
  • 5Stoupis C, Taylor HM, Paley MR, et al. The Rocky liver:radiologic-pathologic correlation of calcified hepaticmasses. Radiographics 1998; 18:675-85.
  • 6Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performanceevaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system.Eur Radiol 2006;16:256-68.
  • 7Fletcher JG, Takahashi N, Hartman R, et al. Dual-energy and dual-source CT: is there a role in the abdomen andpelvis- Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47:41-57.
  • 8Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Paulson EK, et al. Assessmentof the optimal temporal window for intravenous CTcholangiography. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:2531-7.
  • 9Kim JE, Lee JM, Baek JH, et al. Initial assessment ofdual-energy CT in patients with gallstones or bile ductstones: can virtual nonenhanced images replace truenonenhanced images- AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198:817-24.
  • 10Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protectionagainst external radiation. Adopted by the ICRP and ICRUin September 1995. Ann ICRP 1996; 26(3-4):1-205.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部