期刊文献+

The EPSPS Pro106Ser substitution solely accounts for glyphosate resistance in a goosegrass(Eleusine indica) population from Tennessee, United States 被引量:1

The EPSPS Pro106Ser substitution solely accounts for glyphosate resistance in a goosegrass(Eleusine indica) population from Tennessee, United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Previous studies have documented the occurrence of glyphosate-resistant (GR) goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.) and, in at least some cases, resistance is due to an altered target site. Research was performed to determine if an altered target site was responsible for GR in a Tennessee, United States goosegrass population (TennGR). DNA sequencing revealed a mutation in TennGR plants conferring the Prol06Ser 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) substitution previously identified in other GR populations. F2 populations were derived from TennGR plants crossed with plants from a glyphosate-susceptible population (TennGS) and analyzed for their response to glyphosate and genotyped at the EPSPS locus. Plants from the F2 populations segregated 1:2:1 sensitive:intermediate:resistant in response to a selec- tive dose of glyphosate, and these responses co-segregated with the EPSPS genotypes (PP106, PS106, and SS106). To separately investigate the effect of the Prol06Ser substitution on GR, glyphosate dose-response curves and 50% effective dose (EDso) values were compared among the three genotypes and the two parental populations. The SS106 genotype was 3.4-fold resistant relative to the PP106 genotype, identical to the resistance level obtained when comparing the resistant and susceptible parental populations. We conclude that the mutation conferring a Prol06Ser EPSPS mutation is solely responsible for GR in the TennGR goosegrass population. Previous studies have documented the occurrence of glyphosate-resistant (GR) goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.) and, in at least some cases, resistance is due to an altered target site. Research was performed to determine if an altered target site was responsible for GR in a Tennessee, United States goosegrass population (TennGR). DNA sequencing revealed a mutation in TennGR plants conferring the Prol06Ser 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) substitution previously identified in other GR populations. F2 populations were derived from TennGR plants crossed with plants from a glyphosate-susceptible population (TennGS) and analyzed for their response to glyphosate and genotyped at the EPSPS locus. Plants from the F2 populations segregated 1:2:1 sensitive:intermediate:resistant in response to a selec- tive dose of glyphosate, and these responses co-segregated with the EPSPS genotypes (PP106, PS106, and SS106). To separately investigate the effect of the Prol06Ser substitution on GR, glyphosate dose-response curves and 50% effective dose (EDso) values were compared among the three genotypes and the two parental populations. The SS106 genotype was 3.4-fold resistant relative to the PP106 genotype, identical to the resistance level obtained when comparing the resistant and susceptible parental populations. We conclude that the mutation conferring a Prol06Ser EPSPS mutation is solely responsible for GR in the TennGR goosegrass population.
出处 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第6期1304-1312,共9页 农业科学学报(英文版)
关键词 herbicide resistance monogenic trait GLYPHOSATE PCR amplification of specific alleles (PASA) EPSPS target-site mutation herbicide resistance, monogenic trait, glyphosate, PCR amplification of specific alleles (PASA), EPSPS, target-site mutation
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Baerson S R, Rodriguez D J, Tran M, Feng Y, Biest N A, Dill G M. 2002. Glyphosate-resistant goosegrass. Identification of a mutation in the target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate- 3-phosphate synthase. Plant Physiology, 129, 1265-1275.
  • 2Bell M S, Hager A G, Tranel P J. 2013. Multiple resistance to herbicides from four site-of-action groups in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Science, 61,460-468.
  • 3Bostamam Y, Malone J M, Dolman F C, Boutsalis P, Preston C. 2012. Rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) populations containing a target site mutation in EPSPS and reduced glyphosate translocation are more resistant to glyphosate. Weed Science. 60. 474-479.
  • 4Bradshaw L D, Padgette S R, Kimball S L, Wells B H. 1997. Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technology, 11, 189-198.
  • 5Buker R S III, Steed S T, Stall W M. 2002. Confirmation and control of a paraquat-tolerant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) biotype. Weed Technology, 16, 309-313.
  • 6Busi R, Neve P, Powles S. 2012. Evolved polygenic resistance in Lolium rigidum by low-dose herbicide selection within standing genetic variation. Evolutionary Applications, 6, 231-242.
  • 7Caseley J C, Coupland D. 1985. Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement and activity. In: Grossbard E, Atkinson D, eds., The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworths, London. pp. 92-123.
  • 8Chatham L. 2014. Examination of target-site-based mechanism of glyphosate resistance in waterhemp. MSc thesis, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, IL. pp. 64-73.
  • 9Dinelli G, Marotti I, Bonetti A, Caltizone P, Urbano J M, Barnes J. 2008. Physiological and molecular bases of glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis biotypes from Spain. Weed Research, 48, 257-265.
  • 10Doyle J J, Doyle J L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13-15.

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部