期刊文献+

锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差 被引量:1

Off-line correction for cone-beam CT setup errors of lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:应用锥形束CT(CBCT)测量肺癌患者的摆位误差,探讨摆位误差离线校正方法。方法:选取21例胸部肿瘤患者,分次放疗前每日行CBCT扫描1次,通过与计划CT配准后,记录患者左右、前后及头脚方向的摆位误差,并计算出PTV的扩边大小。模拟两种摆位误差离线校正策略,分别通过首次治疗时图像引导(M1)和前3次治疗图像引导(M2)的摆位误差校正治疗床的位置,根据等中心的激光线在体模上重新标记等中心位置。分析采用不同策略校正后的摆位误差。结果:无图像引导时,本中心肺部肿瘤的摆位误差在左右、前后与头脚方向的摆位误差分别为(-0.40±1.91)、(-0.71±0.38)、(-1.37±0.94)mm;与之相对应的计划靶区(PTV)扩边分别为5.49、4.31、8.96 mm。使用两种离线校正后,左右、前后与头脚方向的摆位误差分别为(0.13±1.91)、(-0.57±0.38)、(1.06±0.94)mm(M1),(0.05±1.91)、(-0.11±0.38)、(0.52±0.94)mm(M2);对应的PTV扩边缩小为4.82、4.11、7.60 mm(M1),4.04、1.60、3.28 mm(M2)。结论:离线校正能减小摆位误差,缩小PTV扩边,保证治疗质量的同时提高临床效率。 Abstract: Objective To measure the setup errors of patients with lung cancer by using cone-beam CT (CBCT) and to study on the off-line correction for CBCT setup errors of lung cancer. Methods Totally, 21 patients with lung cancer were selectde. Before radiotherapy, each patient accepted a CBCT scan each day. After the registration with the planning CT, the setup errors from three directions, left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), superior-interior (SI) were recorded and the planning target volume (PTV) margin was calculated. Two kinds of off-line correction strategies for CBCT setup errors were simulated, correcting the position of treatment couch by the setup errors of image guidance in the first treatment (MI) and image guidance in the first three treatments (M2), and resetting the treatment isocenter markers on the thermoplastic mask according to the isocenter laser. The setup errors after the corrections of different strategies were analyzed. Results Without image-guidance, the setup errors of patients with lung cancer in the directions of LR, AP and SI were respectively (-0.40±1.91) mm, (-0.71±0.38) mm, (-1.37±0.94) mm, and the corresponding PTV margins were respectively 5.49 mm, 4.31 mm, 8.96 mm. With two kinds of off-line corrections, the setup errors of M 1 in the directions of LR, AP and SI were respectively (0.13± 1.91) mm, (-0.57±0.38) mm, (1.06±0.94) mm, and those of M2 were respectively (0.05±1.91) mm, (-0.11±0.38) mm, (0.52±0.94) mm. The ccorresponding PTV margins of M 1 were respectively 4.82 mm, 4.11mm, 7.60 mm, and those of M2 were respectively 4.04 mm, 1.60 mm, 3.28 mm. Conclusion The off-line correction reduces the setup error and PTV margin, improves the treatment efficiency without affecting the treatment quality.
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2016年第6期573-575,583,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词 肺癌 调强放疗 锥形束CT 图像引导 摆位误差 靶区外放距离 lung cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy cone-beam CT image guidance setup error planning target volume margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1TOPOLNJAK R, SONKE J J, NIJKAMP J, et al. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 78(4): 1235-1243.
  • 2YEUNG A R, LJ J G, SHI W, et al. Tumor localization using cone- beam CT reduces setup margins in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for lung tumors [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 74(4): 1100-1107.
  • 3BISSONNETTE J P, PURDIE T G, HIGGINS J A, et al. Cone- beam computed tomographic image guidance for lung cancer radiation therapy [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 73(3): 927-934.
  • 4尹勇,袁双虎,刘同海,卢洁,于金明.加速器附加锥形束CT图像质量评价[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(3):225-228. 被引量:25
  • 5WANG J, BAI S, CHEN N, et al. Preliminary study on the clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography- guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer[ J ]. Radiother Oncol, 2008, 90(2): 221-227.
  • 6UNDERBERG R W, LAGERWAARD F J, SLOTMAN B J, et al. Use of maximum intensity projections (MIP) for target volume generation in 4DCT scans for lung cancer [J]. lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005, 63(1): 253-260.
  • 7VAN ROOIJEN D C, VAN WIERINGEN N, STIPPEL G, et al. Dose- guided radiotherapy: potential benefit of online dose recalculation for stereotactic lung irradiation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 83(4): e557-e562.
  • 8LETOURNEAU D, WANG J W, OLDHAM M, et al. Cone-beam- CT guided radiotherapy: technical implementation[ J]. Radiother Oncol, 2005, 75(3): 279- 286.
  • 9王丹,沙翔燕,林海磊.中上段食管癌图像引导放疗中摆位误差及靶区外放边界的确定[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2014,34(8):610-612. 被引量:15
  • 10吴钦宏,李高峰,王婵,李雪南,王丹,沙翔燕.基于锥形束CT体部肿瘤图像引导放疗的摆位误差分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(1):68-71. 被引量:26

二级参考文献32

  • 1于金明,袁双虎.图像引导放射治疗研究及其发展[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(2):81-83. 被引量:99
  • 2戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 3刘跃平,刘新帆,李晔雄,李涛.盆腔肿瘤三维适形放疗摆位重复性研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):313-316. 被引量:44
  • 4邬筱莹,章真,王文超,任珺,郭晓梅,陆惠忠.电子射野影像装置对盆腔肿瘤放疗摆位误差的测定[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(1):52-54. 被引量:26
  • 5Mutic S,Palta JR,Butker EK,et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process:report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No.66.Med Phys,2003,30:2762-2792.
  • 6van Herk M,Remeijer P,Rasch C,et al.The probability of correct target dosage:dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phya,2000,47:1121-1135.
  • 7van Herk M.Errors and margins in radiotherapy.Semin Radiat Oncol,2004,14:52-64.
  • 8International commission on radiation units and measurements.ICRU Report 62.Prescribing,recording,and reporting photon beam therapy (Supplement to ICRU Report 50).Bethesda:ICRU,1999.
  • 9Stroom JC,de Boer HC, Huizenga H,et al. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,43:905-919.
  • 10Stroom JC,Heijmen BJ.Geometrical uncertainties,radiotherapy planning margins,and the ICRU-62 report. Radiother Oncol,2002,64:75-83.

共引文献74

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部