期刊文献+

2009-2015年高考论说类文本中的逻辑问题及对策 被引量:1

Logic Problems and Countermeasures in Argument Text of College Entrance Examination from 2009-2015
原文传递
导出
摘要 思维能力是高中语文学习的核心素养之一,也是语文学习评价的重要意项。在语文高考中,对学生逻辑思维能力的评价,相当一部分由论说类文本的阅读理解来承担。从某种意义上说,论说类文本的阅读理解题,就是考量思维能力的工具。它要求该部分试题要有足够的指向逻辑思维测试的容量,另一方面,要求论说类文本自身的逻辑应该经得起检验。但是,在近年来的语文高考试卷中,仍然能从一些论说类文本中发现逻辑问题。对命题者来说,一方面可争取减少这样的漏洞,但也可以适当利用选文本身的逻辑问题,命制一些专门指向思维能力的测试题,这样做不仅能改善高考语文选文的质量,还为试卷命制提供了一种新的思路。 Thinking ability is not only one of the core literacy of high school Chinese language learning, but also important indicators to evaluate. In Chinese language college entrance examination, a substantial part of the assessment of students' logical thinking ability is implemented by reading comprehension of argumentative text. In a sense, the reading comprehension of argumentative text is a tool to evaluate thinking ability. It requires that this part of the exam have enough proportion which point to test the logical thinking. On the other hand, the argumentative text itself should stand the test of logic. However, in recent years, there are still some logic problems in the text of Chinese language college entrance examination. To proposition people, they can seek to reduce mistakes and also make appropriate use of the loopholes in the text. It will not only improve the quality of the text in Chinese language college entrance examination, but also provide a new way to think about the proposition of examination papers.
作者 郑桂华
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期110-119,共10页 Global Education
关键词 语文高考 论说类文本 逻辑问题 Chinese college entrance examination argumentative text logic problems
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1祝新华.促进学习的阅读评估[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2015:47.
  • 2加里·R·卡比等.思维[M].韩广忠译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:168.
  • 3斯蒂芬·雷曼.逻辑的力量[M].杨武金译.北京:人民大学出版社,2010:85.
  • 4D.AlanBensley.心理学批判性思维[M].李小平译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2005:26.
  • 5石勇.是什么让中国人“不讲逻辑”[J].南风窗,2012(9):89-91. 被引量:4
  • 6何丹.中国文化研究[M].夏之卷,2008:173-179.

共引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部