期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

诊断准确性研究报告规范(STARD)2015介绍与解读 被引量：16

Introduction and Explanation of the Updated Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies(STARD 2015)
原文传递
导出
摘要 诊断准确性研究报告规范(Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies,STARD)2015版在适用性和潜在偏倚新证据的基础上,对STARD 2003版报告规范的清单和流程图进行了修订增补,以更好地指导诊断试验的规范报告。目前国内诊断性实验研究报告规范均基于STARD 2003版,本文对STARD 2003版的应用现状进行描述,并对STARD 2015版进行介绍和解读。 The Standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies （STARD） 2015 is a revision of the STARD 2003 on the checklist and flow chart, on the basis of the new evidences of potential bias and applicability, to better guide the application of diagnostic test in clinical practices. Currently, the interpretation and application in China is still based on STARD 2003. This review will describe the application status of the original version and introduce the updated standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
作者 朱一丹 李会娟 武阳丰
机构地区 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系 北京大学临床研究所 北京大学医学部乔治健康研究所
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2016年第6期730-735,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 诊断试验 诊断准确性研究报告规范 更新 潜在偏倚 报告透明度 Diagnostic Test The Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Update Potential bias Reporting transparency
分类号 R4 [医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 826-832.
  • 2Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ, 2003, 326(7379): 41-44.
  • 3Whiting PF, Rut)es AWS, Westwood ME, et al. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. JClin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(10): 1093-1104.
  • 4Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem, 2003, 49(1): 7-18.
  • 5Lijmer JG. Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias. JAMA, 1999, 282(11): 1061-1066.
  • 6Ochodo EA, de Haan MC, Reitsma JB, et al. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin". Radiology, 2013, 267(2): 581-588.
  • 7Korevaar DA, Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PMM, et al. Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Clin Chem, 2014, 60(4): 651-659.
  • 8Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 2001, 357(9263): 1191- 1194.
  • 9STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.Avaliable at: http://www.equator- network.orglreporting-guidelines/stard/.
  • 10Kressel HY. STARD 2015 Update. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 617.

二级参考文献27

  • 1Guyatt GH,Tugwell PX,Feeny DH,Haynes RB,Drummond M.A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.Can Med Assoc J,1986; 134:587-594.
  • 2Frybaek DG,Thornbury JR.The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.Med Decis Making,1991; 11:88-94.
  • 3Kent DL,Larson EB.Disease,level of impact,and quality of research methods.Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging.Invest Radiol,1992; 27:245-254.
  • 4Griner PF,Mayewski RJ,Mushlin AI,et al.Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures.Principles and applications.Ann Intern Med,1981; 94:557-592.
  • 5Sackett DL,Haynes RB,Guyatt GH,et al.The selection of diagnostic tests.In:Sackett D,editor.Clinical epidemiology,2nd ed.Boston/Toronto/London:Little,Brown and Company; 1991:47-57.
  • 6Metz CE.Basic principles of ROC analysis.Semin Nucl Med,1978;8:283-298.
  • 7Reid MC,Laehs MS,Feinstein AR.Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research.Getting better but still not good.JAMA,1995; 274:645-651.
  • 8Nelemans PJ,Leiner T,de Vet HCW,et al.Peripheral arterial disease:Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography.Radiology,2000; 217:105-114.
  • 9Devries SO,Hunink MGM,Polak JF.Summary receiver operating characteristic curves as a technique for meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in peripheral arterial disease.Acad Radiol,1996; 3:361-369.
  • 10Lijmer JG,Mol BW,Heisterkamp S,et al.Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.JAMA,1999; 282:1061-1066.

共引文献22

同被引文献121

引证文献16

二级引证文献59

中国循证医学杂志
2016年 第6期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部