期刊文献+

全球制造业服务化对行业绩效与全要素生产率的影响——基于国际投入产出数据的实证分析 被引量:17

On the Effects of Global Manufacturing Industry Servicizing on Industry Performance and Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis Base on the World Input-Output Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过世界主要制造业国家的投入产出表数据,实证分析服务化对制造业的产业绩效与生产率变化的影响,研究发现:制造业"服务化"主要表现为"双刃剑"式中性影响,行业如果通过产业调整能实现增长,那么在服务化的背景下行业的绩效与全要素生产率(TFP)就会自发出现"自我促进"的良性循环发展,反之服务化也会放大对行业负面的影响,出现所谓的"服务化困境"。因此工业化与服务业应保持相对较为均衡的发展,不应当在实体产业不完善的条件下盲目发展相关服务业。 Based on the input-output data of world's leading manufacturing countries, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the influence of manufacturing industry servicizing on the changes of industry performance and total product productivity(TFP) of the manufacturing industry. The findings show that the manufacturing industry"servicizing"is mainly manifested as a neutral impact of"double-edged sword"type. If the industry can realize its growth through industrial adjustment, the industry performance and TFP in the context of servicizing will have a spontaneous development in"self promoting"virtuous circle; conversely, servicizing will also amplify its negative impact on the industry, a so-called "servicizing paradox" will come into being. Therefore, a relatively balanced development should be maintained between industrialization and the service industry, it is not proper to develop the related service industry blindly under the imperfect conditions of the industrial entities.
作者 肖挺 蒋金法
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期86-98,共13页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"构建基于生态文明建设的公共财政体制研究"(15ZDB159) 江西省教育厅科技青年项目"江西省科技服务业发展战略研究"(GJJ150456) 2015年江西省高等学校省级教学改革立项项目"基于校企合作模式的高校服务创新研究"(JXJG-15-4-10) 中国博士后科学基金第59批面上资助项目"组织生态视角下制造业服务化战略抉择的影响因素分析"
关键词 制造业 服务化困境 全要素生产率 国际投入产出表 manufacturing industry servicizing paradox Total Factor Productivity the World In put-Output Tables
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Neely A.. Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing[J]. Operations Management Re- search 2008, 1(2): 103-118.
  • 2Fang E., Palmatier R., Steenkamp, J.. Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value[J]. Journal of Marketing 2008, 72(4): 1-14.
  • 3Visnjic I., Neely A., Wiengarten F.. Another Performance Paradox? A Ref'med View on the Performance Impact of Servitization[R]. ESADE Working Paper. 2012.
  • 4Gebauer H., Fleisch E., Friedli T.. Overcoming the Service Paradox in Manufacturing Companies. European Manage- ment Journal, 2005, 23(5): 14-26.
  • 5Kastalli I. V., Looy B. V.. Servitization: Disentangling the Impact of Service Business Model Innovation Onmanufactur- ing Firm Performance[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2013, 31(7): 169-180.
  • 6Baines T. S., Lighfoot H. W., Benedettlni O., Kay J. M.. The Servitization of Manufacturing. A Review of Literature and Reflection on Future Challenges[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 2009, 20(5): 547-567.
  • 7Vandermerwe S., Rada, J.. Servitization of Business: Adding Value by Adding Services[J]. European Management Jour- nal, 1988, 6(4): 314-324.
  • 8姜铸,李宁.服务创新、制造业服务化对企业绩效的影响[J].科研管理,2015,36(5):29-37. 被引量:98
  • 9周大鹏.制造业服务化对产业转型升级的影响[J].世界经济研究,2013(9):17-22. 被引量:74
  • 10Reinartz W. W., Vlaga W.. How to Sell Services More Profitable[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2008, 27(5): 160-172.

二级参考文献187

共引文献4111

同被引文献208

二级引证文献223

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部