期刊文献+

基于语义学-语用学并合模式的默认意义研究 被引量:9

Default meaning from a semantics-pragmatics merger approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于经典格赖斯会话含义理论不能很好地解释所言中的语用成分,默认语义学提出了语义学和语用学并合研究的新模式,认为对所言扩充的意义是默认意义。本研究系统阐述了默认语义学的理论背景、特点及缺陷等问题,并针对其存在的不足提出了解决方案。研究发现,作为温和语境论的代表,默认语义学框架下的默认意义为推导的意义,它受到句法的限制,表明默认语义学本质上是以语用学为根本原则的交际行为理论。 Since Grice's theory of conversational implicature cannot well explain pragmatic elements in what is said,Default Semantics proposes a semantics-pragmatics merger representation model, in which the enriched meanings of what is said are default meanings. This paper presents an overview of this model and discusses its theoretical concerns such as specialties and defects of Default Semantics. It is found that default meanings are inferential in nature, which needs the help of syntactic constraint. In essence, default semantics, as a moderate contextualist approach, is a pragmatics-based semantic theory of acts of communication.
作者 张延飞
机构地区 山东大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期337-345,438,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"默认意义的语用-句法研究"(15BYY173) 山东大学首批青年学者未来计划资助项目(2015WLJH06)的阶段性成果
关键词 默认语义学 默认意义 并合表征 语用学 语义学 default meaning default semantics merger representation semantics pragmatics
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Bach,K.1994.Conversational impliciture[J].Mind&Language 9(2):124-162.
  • 2Bach,K.2001.You don't say?[J].Synthese 127:15-44.
  • 3Cappelen,H.&E.Lepore.2005.Insensitive Semantics[M].Oxford:Blackwell.
  • 4Grice,P.1975.Logic and conversation[A].In P.Cole&J.Morgan(eds.).Syntax and Semantics 3:Speech Acts[C].New York:Academic Press,41-58.
  • 5Grice,P.1989.Studies in the Way of Words[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
  • 6Grice,P.2001.Aspects of Reason[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  • 7Jaszczolt,K.2005.Default Semantics:Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  • 8Jaszczolt,K.2006.Meaning merger:Pragmatic inference,defaults,and compositionality[J].Intercultural Pragmatics 3(2):195-212.
  • 9Jaszczolt,K.2007.The syntax-pragmatics merger:Belief reports in the theory of default semantics[J].Pragmatics&Cognition 15(1):41-64.
  • 10Jaszczolt,K.2009.Pragmatic compositionality,syntactic direction principle,and the contextualism/minimalism debate[A].In J.M.Larrazabal&L.Zubeldia(eds.).Meaning,Content and Argument[C].Bilbao:University of the Basque Country Press,347-364.

二级参考文献31

  • 1Agerri, R. & Korta, K. Pragmatically Determined Aspects of Utterance Meaning: Explicature, Impliciture, and Implicature. Report No. ILCLI-01-LIC-10, June ,2001.
  • 2Atlas,J. Logic,Meaning and Conversation[ M ]. Oxford:OUP,2005.
  • 3Bach, K. Default Reasoning: Jumping to Conclusions and Knowing When to Think Twice [ J ]. Paciftc Philosophical Ouarterly. 1984 (65).
  • 4Bach, K. Semantic Slack : What is Said and More [ A ]. In Tsohatzidis, S. L. ( ed. ) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives [ C ]. London : Routledge, 1994.
  • 5Bach, K. The Semantics-pragmatics Distinction : What It is and Why It Matters [ J ]. Linguistiche Berichte , 1997 ( 8 ).
  • 6Bach, K. Regressions in' Pragmatics ( and Semantics) [ A ]. In Burton- Roberts, N. ( ed. ) Pragmatics [ C ]. Basingstoke: Palgrave ,2007.
  • 7Carston, R. Thoughts and Utterances:The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [ M ]. Oxford : Blackwel1,2002.
  • 8Garrett, M. & Harnish, M. Experimental Pragmatics : Testing for Implicitures[ J]. Pragmatics and Cognition ,2007 ( 15 ).
  • 9Grice, P. Logic and Conversation [ A ]. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. ( eds. ) 'Syntax and Pragmatics 3: Speech Acts[ C ]. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • 10Grice, P. Studies in the Way of Words [ M ]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.

共引文献15

同被引文献47

引证文献9

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部