期刊文献+

股浅动脉支架内再狭窄的危险因素研究进展 被引量:13

Risk factors for superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis: recent progress in research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股浅动脉(SFA)支架植入血管成形术是针对SFA狭窄或闭塞性病变的腔内常用治疗方法,但支架植入术后股浅动脉支架内再狭窄(superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis,SFA-ISR)的发生率很高,由于大多数的患者直到出现严重临床症状才会再次寻求诊治,所以对于控制支架内再狭窄(ISR)相关危险因素至关重要。近年对SFA-ISR的危险因素研究不断深入,本文就其解剖学特点、病理生理学基础、危险因素研究进展作一综述。 Superficial femoral artery stent implantation has been a common endovascular treatment for the stenosis or occlusive lesions of superficial femoral artery. Because the incidence of superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis (SFA-ISR) is high and usually most clinical patients will not seek for medical consultation and treatment until they developed severe clinical symptoms, it is extremely important to effectively control ISR- related risk factors for patients who have received superficial femoral artery stent implantation. In recent years, many valuable studies on the risk factors of SFA-ISR have been conducted. This paper aims to make a detailed review concerning the anatomical characteristics, pathophysiological basis and risk factors of SFA-ISR.
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期554-558,共5页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
基金 首都临床特色应用研究资助项目(Z141107002514063,Z131107002213041) 北京市医院管理局“登峰”人才计划(DFL20150801)
关键词 股浅动脉 支架内再狭窄:危险因素 superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis risk factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, et al.Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting[ J]. Circulation, 2007, 115 : 2745-2749.
  • 2Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stentts in the superficial femoral artery[ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354: 1879-1888.
  • 3Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, et al. Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angloplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3: 267-276.
  • 4Qi YX, Qu MJ, Long DK, et al. Rho-GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha downregulated by low shear stress promotes vascular smooth muscle cell migration and apoptosis: a proteomic analysis[Jl. Cardiovasc Res, 2008, 80: 114-122.
  • 5Herisson F, Heymann MF, Chetiveaux MA, et al. Carotid and femoral atherosclerotic plaques show different morphology[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2011, 216: 348-354.
  • 6Campbell JH, Campbell GR. Smooth muscle phenotypic modulation: a personal experience[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2012, 32: 1754-1789.
  • 7潘春仰,邱建平,陆林,张奇,张瑞岩,沈卫峰.冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄相关因素[J].介入放射学杂志,2015,24(6):467-471. 被引量:36
  • 8Kasaoka S, Tobis JM, Akiyan T, et al. Angio-aphic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1998, 32: 1630-1635.
  • 9Bakken AM, Palchik E, Hart J'P, et al. Impact of diabetes meUitus on outcomes of superficial femoral artery edoluminal interventions[ J]. J asc Surg, 2007, 46: 953-958.
  • 10Gary T, Pdef P, Stojakovic T, et al. Lipoproteins and the development of restenosis after stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery in patients with peripheral artery disease[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2011, 34: 739-743.

二级参考文献5

共引文献35

同被引文献80

引证文献13

二级引证文献141

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部