摘要
司法实践中,需对不少专业技术性问题予以鉴定,但社会却无可供人民法院委托的鉴定机构。这类问题常表现为跨学科、多学科或特殊行业及其他具有复杂疑难特征的技术争议;还有一些其他情况,比如经多次鉴定难有定论,或当事人对社会鉴定机构的技术水准或公信力失去信任。人民法院面对上述问题或情况,基于查明案件技术事实的需要,作者认为,有必要由人民法院整合社会上的相关专家进行联合鉴定是可选路径。本文对人民法院建立组织专家程序的必要性和法理基础进行了阐述,同时对实际情况进行了介绍。
In judicial practice, there is a number of professional technical identification, and there is no appraisal institution for the people's court to entrust. This kind of problem is often characterized by interdisciplinary subject, multi-disciplinary subject, special industries, and other complicated technical controversies. And there are some other situations, such as the difficulties in reaching conclusion after repeated identification, or the parties' losing faith in the technical level or credibility of social appraisal institutions. In face of all these problems or situations, it is necessary for the people's court to adopt measures to solve them based on the need of finding out technology facts of the case. The author thinks that the people's court shall integrate relevant experts to carry out joint identification. This paper explained the necessity and the legal basis of the people's court's establishing organization experts program, and introduces the actual situation at the same time.
出处
《医学与法学》
2016年第3期76-78,共3页
Medicine and Jurisprudence
关键词
案件技术事实查明
法院组织
联合鉴定
find out technology facts of the case
court organization
joint identification