整体主义与空间的政治经济学的本质——评《为增长而规划:中国城市与区域规划》被引量：10

Holism and the Fundamental of the Political Economy of Space: A Critical Review of Planning for Growth: Urban and Regional Planning in China

原文传递

导出

摘要《为增长而规划:中国城市与区域规划》提供了一个站在全球视角总结并检讨当代中国城市与区域规划的高水平学术作品,同时也提供了一个检讨高水平学术本身的样本。决定两个检讨的,一是中国城市与区域规划的总体特征和价值"客观"上是怎样的;二是经济社会发展需要的是怎样的逻辑,这是评价一并预见其未来发展的基础;三是如何才能正确认知事物,这是一和二进而两个检讨的共同基础。本文力求以简明的逻辑完成全部线索的关键解答,最终初步建构整体主义本体论、认识论和方法论的框架。 Planning for Growth： Urban and Reginal Planning in China provides both a high-level academic work to review contemporary Chinese urban and regional planning and a sample to critically review academic work itself. What underlying the two reviews are： 1） What are the ＂objective＂ general characteristics and values of Chinese urban and regional planning; 2） What is the proper logic demanded by socio-economic development, which is the basis to review 1 ） and anticipate its future; 3） How to properly recognize things, which is the common foundation of 1） and 2） and hence the two reviews. The paper tries to conduct the key answering of all these leads by succinct logic, and eventually accomplish the preliminary establishment of ontology, epistemology and methodology of Holism.

作者王红扬

机构地区南京大学建筑与城市规划学院

出处《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期3-15,共13页 Urban Planning International

关键词规划增长空间的政治经济学整体主义整体主义规划方法论认识论本体论 Planning Growth The Political Economy of Space Holism Holistic Planning Methodology Epistemology Ontology

分类号 TU982.2 [建筑科学—城市规划与设计]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1霍尔P.城市与区域规划[M].邹德慈,金经元,译.中国建筑工业出版社,1985.
2Wu Fulong.Planning for Growth:Urban and Regional Planning in China[M].RTPI,2015.
3Harvey David.A Brief History of Neoliberalism[M].Oxford University Press,2005.
4Faludi Andreas.A Reader in Planning Thoery[M].Pergamon Press,1973.
5王红扬.对新时代背景下中国城市化研究的方法论思考[J].城市规划,2000,24(6):7-16. 被引量：25
6约翰·R.洛根,哈维·L.莫洛奇.都市财富:空间的政治经济学[M].陈那波,等,译.格致出版社,上海人民出版社,2016.
7Wildavsky Aaron.If Planning Is Everything,Maybe It’s Nothing[J].Policy Sciences,1973(2):127-153.
8华揽洪.关于1949-1979年中国城市规划的专著《重建中国》(Reconstruire La Chine).
9张京祥,罗震东.《中国当代城乡规划思潮》.
10Kuhn T S. The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research[A] //Kuhn T S. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977: 225-239.