期刊文献+

自助式定价商品营销策略的均衡及非均衡状态研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究了在期望收益最大化目标下自助式商品的定价和营销策略。综合考虑两种基本的营销策略,即付出一定的沉淀成本和降价,从消费者在不同营销策略下的选择行为出发,研究了均衡市场和非均衡市场下两种策略的收益情况,有助于厂商选取正确的营销方式。研究表明:在均衡市场下,影响收益的分别是客流量和纯利润;而在非均衡市场下,概率弹性较大时付出沉淀成本的策略有效,而降价的策略在任何概率弹性下都是无效的。最后提出了自助餐市场应依据客流量决定是否付出沉淀成本等建议。 This article analyses the pricing and marketing strategies of buffet-style commodities for the purpose of maximizing the ex- pected returns. It compares the two fundamental marketing strategies, i.e., cutting price and paying additional sunk cost. Based on the consumers' choice behavior under different marketing strategies, it analyses the returns under each of the two strategies in the situation of market equilibrium or market disequilibrium, which will help the managers choose the right marketing strategy. The results show that, while market equilibrium occurs, the returns are determined by footfall and net profit; while, in market disequilibrium, the elasticity of probability is greater, the strategy of paying additional sunk cost is effective and the strategy of cutting price does not work well no matter whatever the probability elasticity is. Therefore, we suggest that the buffet-style restaurants should make an assessment of their footfalls before taking the strategy of paying additional sunk cost.
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2016年第6期88-94,共7页 Enterprise Economy
基金 全国大学生科研立项B类重点项目及2016年大学生挑战杯A类重点助推项目"基于Bregman距离的一致性风险测度及其应用"(项目编号:71171095)
关键词 自助式定价 营销策略 购买概率 概率弹性 期望收益 buffet-style commodity pricing marketing strategy probability of purchasing probability elasticity expected return
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Oi W Y. A Disneyland Dilemma: Two-Part Tariffs for a Mickey Mouse Monopoly [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1971, 85:77-96.
  • 2Nahata, B., Ostaszewski, K. M., Sahoo, P. (1999). Buffet pricing[J].General Information, 72, 2, 215-28.
  • 3黄道名,王秋萍.试析第16届亚运会门票定价问题——基于大型综合赛事门票定价体系的计量模型分析[J].体育科学,2011,31(1):69-74. 被引量:2
  • 4Hayrapetyan, A., Tardos,, Wexler, T. (2005). A network pricing game for selfish traffic [J].Distributed Computing (Vol. volume 19, pp.255-266(12).
  • 5Briest, P., Hoefer, M., Krysta, P. (2008). Stackelberg network pricing games[J].Algorithmica, 62, 3-4, 733-753.
  • 6Just, D. R., Wansink, B. (2011). The flat-rate pricing paradox: conflicting effects of "all-you-can-eat" buffet pricing [J].Review of Economicss&sstatistics, 193-200.

二级参考文献9

  • 1陈立昌.广东城乡居民收入差距的地区差异分析.经济论坛,2008,(19):13-13.
  • 2第16届亚洲运动会官方网站[EB/OL].http://www.gz2010.cn/.
  • 3人民网.广州亚运会总投资或将突破1200亿元[EB/OL].http://sports.people.com.cn.
  • 4史宾 王颖.综合型运动会门票定价理论研究.中国体育科枯,2009,45(8):6-8.
  • 5世界统计年鉴[EB/OL].http://www.pinggu.org.cn.
  • 6中国新闻网.广州亚运会开幕式门票售罄中签比例约为1:3[EB/OL].http://www.chinanews.com.cn.
  • 7.中华人民共和国国家统计局[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn.,.
  • 8黄群玲,黄群艳.2010年广州亚运会门票销售的经营与管理[J].首都体育学院学报,2009,21(4):399-402. 被引量:5
  • 9The State Sport General Administration (December 15,2000).2001~2010年体育改革与发展纲要[J].体育科学,2001,21(3):1-6. 被引量:147

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部