NoteFirst在参考文献编校应用中的问题及对策

Problems and suggestions in the application of NoteFirst

【目的】提醒编辑在工作中不要盲目依靠参考文献辅助编校系统,建议技术人员要针对问题完善软件的应用。【方法】简单阐述Note First参考文献辅助编校系统的价值,对使用过程中发现的问题进行归纳、整理、分析,并提出使用建议。【结果】Note First参考文献辅助编校系统大大提高了编辑人员的工作效率和稿件的编校质量,但是由于技术原因或检索数据库自身存在的差错,批注提示经验证正确的编校报告有时会出现与原题录相左、作者姓名表达错误等问题。【结论】Note First参考文献辅助编校系统为编辑提供了方便,针对系统缺陷,软件开发人员应进一步完善系统,编辑需要对软件编校结果严格把关,使参考文献著录格式规范且内容正确,以提高论文水平和期刊质量。

[Purposes]This paper aims to remind the editors of not blindly relying on the reference auxiliary editing system in the work,and recommend the technicians to improve the software. [Methods] The value of NoteFirst reference auxiliary editing system was simply elaborated,and the problems found in the process of using the system were summed up and analyzed to make suggestions. [Findings]NoteFirst reference auxiliary editing system could greatly improve the work efficiency of editors and the quality of editing and proofreading. But due to technical reasons or retrieval database problems,the editing reports proven correctly by the software appeared disagreement with the original references,author name errors,and other problems. [Conclusions]NoteFirst provides convenience for the editors. As for the system defect,software developers should further improve the system.The editors should strictly check software editing results and make the reference description with standardized formats and correct contents in order to improve the level of theses and the quality of journals.