期刊文献+

“追累”句式的歧义新解 被引量:1

A New Interpretation of the Ambiguity of the Mandarin Zhui-lei Construction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "追累"句式有宾语指向、主语指向和施受颠倒三种解读,是现代汉语多歧义句式的代表,也是近年来汉语研究的一个热点。通过梳理现有的研究思路和主要问题,本文提出了基于事件结构分析的新方法,对"追累"句式的三种语义分别解读为状态维度上的有界致使运动事件、时间维度上的有界自发运动事件和时间维度上的有界无意致使运动事件。这种分析方法不仅反映了汉语V-V复合词生成的语序特点及相关事件的深层语义关系,还能得到汉语体标记嵌入和相关句式转换关系的支持。 Zhui-lei construction has as many as three interpretations, namely the object-oriented, the subject-oriented and the agent-inverted-with-patient ones. It is the representative of high ambiguous constructions in Mandarin and one of the hot topics of the recent studies on Mandarin. This paper firstly summarizes the major disputes and problems in the existing studies. Then, based on the idea of parallelism between motion event and change-of-state event under the notion of dimensionality, it proposes new analyses for the interpretations of the ambiguity of the zhui-lei construction. The three interpretations of the construction are respectively accounted for through the three corresponding analyses of the events it denotes as a telic caused motion event in the dimension of state, a telic self-initiated motion event in the dimension of time and a telic non-volitional motion event in the dimension of time. The analyses and derivations concerned can be supported by the word-order property in the derivation of Mandarin V-V compounds, underlying semantic relations in the events concerned, the proper insertions of aspectual markers in the construction and legal transformations between the construction and other ones.
出处 《山东外语教学》 2016年第3期12-20,共9页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 国家社科基金项目"事件结构理论与跨语言类型比较参照下的汉语结果句式研究"(项目编号:12BYY089) "北京市属高校高层次人才引进与培养(长城学者)计划项目"的部分成果
关键词 “追累”句式 事件结构 歧义分析 动词复指 zhui-lei construction event structure analyses of ambiguity verb anaphora
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Cheng, L. Resultative compounds and lexical relational structures [ J ]. Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 1997, (3) :167 - 197.
  • 2Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program[ M ]. Cambridge : MIT Press, 1995.
  • 3Davis, H. & H. Demirdache. On lexical verb meanings: Evidence from Salish[ A ]. In C. Tenny & J. Pustejo- vsky ( eds. ). Events as Grammatical Objects[ C]. CSLI Publications, 2000.97 - 142.
  • 4Goldberg, A. Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago : The Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 5Grimshaw, J. Argument Structure[ M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.
  • 6Gu, Y. The Syntax of Resultative and Causative Compounds in Chinese[ D]. Doctoral Dissertation. Cornell Uni- versity, 1992.
  • 7Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure [ M ]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
  • 8Hankamer, J. & I. Sag. Deep and surface anaphora[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, (7) :391 -426.
  • 9Her, One-Soon. Argument -function mismatches in Mandarin resultatives: A lexical mapping account [ J ]. Lingua, 2007,117(1) : 221 -246.
  • 10Hoekstra, T. & R. Mulder. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication[J]. The Lin- guistic Review, 1990, (7) : 1 - 79.

二级参考文献120

共引文献916

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部