期刊文献+

参照性交流与个人学习者学习过程和选择性注意的比较 被引量:3

On Comparison of Learning Process and Selective Attention between Referential Communicators and Individual Learner
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以72名大学生为被试,设计虚拟学习材料,创设参照性交流和个人学习方式,通过功能预测学习任务和维度选择任务,比较参照性交流与个人学习者学习过程、选择性注意的差异特点.结果显示:功能预测中学习阶段1至学习阶段2学习者间成绩差异无统计学意义,学习阶段3至学习阶段10参照高分组成绩显著高于低分组和个人组,差异具有统计学意义;维度选择中参照高分组、低分组被试揭开的维度平均数均显著高于个人组,差异具有统计学意义.表明与个人学习者比较,参照性交流学习优势仅表现于高分学习者;参照性交流学习者选择性注意水平高于个人学习者. 72undergraduate students have participated in the current study.The study is designed for the experimental material of virtual aliens.It has arranged the conditions of individual learning and referential communication learning.Through the functional prediction task and dimension selection task,it has explored the differences of learning process and selective attention among learners.The results showed that,from Block 1to Block 2,there is no significant difference in Function Prediction scores;From Block 3to Block 10,the scores of the high-score group are significantly higher than those of the low-score group and individual group,the average numbers of dimension selection of communication learners are significantly higher than those of individual learners.The results show that,compared with the individual learner,the advantage of referential communication learning only came from the high-score group.The levels of selective attention under the referential communication condition were significantly higher than the level of individual learners.
作者 张恒超
出处 《西南师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第6期162-167,共6页 Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 天津市教育科学"十二五"规划重点课题(HE2014)
关键词 参照性交流 学习 选择性注意 referential communication learning selective attention
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1HELLER D, GORMAN K S TANENHAUS M K. To Name or to Describe: Shared Knowledge Affects Referential Form [J]. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2012, 4(2) : 290--305.
  • 2GALATI A, BRENNAN S E. Attenuating Information in Spoken Communication: For the Speaker, or for the Address- ee? [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2010, 62(1) : 35--51.
  • 3张恒超,阴国恩.关系复杂性对关系类别间接性学习中选择性注意的影响[J].心理科学,2012,35(4):823-828. 被引量:16
  • 4KRONMtiLLER E, BARR D J. Perspective-free Pragmatics: Broken Precedents and the Recovery-from-preemption Hy- pothesis [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2007, 56(3): 436--455.
  • 5YOON S O, KOH S, BROWN-SCHMIDT S. Influence of Perspective and Goals on Reference Production in Conversa- tion [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin ~ Review, 2012, 19(4) : 699--707.
  • 6NAPPA R, ARNOLD J E. The Road to Understanding is Paved with the Speaker's Intentions: Cues to the Speaker's Attention and Intentions Affect Pronoun Comprehension [J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2014, 70: 58--81.
  • 7KRAUSS R M, WEINHEIMER S. Changes in Reference Phrases as a Function of Frequency of Usage in Social Interac- tion: A Preliminary Study [J]. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1: 113--114.
  • 8MARKMAN A B, MAKIN V S. Referential Communication and Category Acquisition [J]. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: General, 1998, 127(4).. 331--354.
  • 9JACQUETTE D. Collective Referential Intentionality in the Semantics of Dialogue [J].Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2014, 36 (49), 143--159.
  • 10张恒超,阴国恩.学习方式对关系类别间接性学习的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2010,8(4):257-262. 被引量:17

二级参考文献208

  • 1Blair M, Homa D L Integrating novel dimensions to eliminate category exceptions: when more is less, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, 31 (2) : 258-271.
  • 2Asmuth J A, Gentner D. Context sensitivity of relational nouns.Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2005:163-168.
  • 3Dixon J A, Bangert A S. On the spontaneous discovery of a mathematical relation during problem solving. Cognitive Science, 2004, 28:433--449.
  • 4Fisher A V, Sloutsky V M. When induction meets memory: Evidence for gradual transition from similarity-based to category- based induction. Child Development, 2005, 76:583-597.
  • 5Gentner D. The development of relational category knowledge. In L Gershkoff-Stowe & D H Rakison, (Eds.) , Building object categories in developmental time. (pp. 245-275) . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 2005.
  • 6Kurtz K J, Boukrina O. Learning relational categories by comparison of paired examples. In L R Gleitman & A K Joshi (Eds.) , Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2004.
  • 7Goldstone R L, Steyvers M, Rogosky B J. Conceptual interrelatedness and caricatures. Memory and Cognition, 2003, 31:169-180.
  • 8Kloos H, Sloutsky V. Are natural kinds psychologically distinct from nominal kinds? Evidence from learning and development. Proceedings of the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago. 2004.
  • 9Gentner D, Kurtz K. Relational categories// Ahn W K, Goldstone R L, Love B C, Markman A B, Wolff P W. Categorization inside and outside the lab. Washington, DC: APA. 2005:151-175.
  • 10Kemp C, Tenenbaum J B, Niyogi S, et al. A probabilistic model of theory formation. Cognition, 2010, 114:165-196.

共引文献58

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部