期刊文献+

多参数融合的飞行品质评估模型的建立 被引量:9

A flying qualities assessment model based on multi-parameter integration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前航空管理机构与航空公司进行飞行品质评估主要是依据经验与简单飞行参数统计数字,这样做难以得出科学、客观的评估结果。基于提升全行业安全保障能力和运行品质的需求,研究了利用计算机技术对飞行品质进行综合评估的方法。选取了理想值逼近法作为飞行品质综合评估的手段,结合波动通道模型作为飞行品质评估的理论基础,基于提出的飞行品质评估模型对飞行品质评估系统进行了设计。对真实的飞行参数数据建立综合评估模型,同时考察多次航班的多个飞行参数,给出综合的飞行品质评估结论,为飞行评估、训练提供理论基础和科学的评判方法。 Currently aviation management perience or simple flight parameters, so it is agencies and airlines assess flight qualities only base on ex- difficult to draw scientific and objective conclusions. Given the requirements of industry-wide security and operation quality, we study the methods of using computers to comprehensively assess flying qualities. The technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) is chosen as a means of comprehensive assessment, which combines with the BOLL model as the theoretical base for flying quality scoring. A flight quality assessment system is put forward based on the model. And a comprehensive assessment model is established based on real flight data, along with more than one flight and multi-parameters, and some comprehensive assessment con- clusions are provided. Thereby the investigation provides a theoretical base, a method and reference for airline flight assessment and training.
出处 《计算机工程与科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期1262-1268,共7页 Computer Engineering & Science
关键词 飞行品质监控 多参数融合 理想值逼近法 波动通道模型 综合评估系统 flight quality monitoring multi-parameter integration technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) volatility channel mode comprehensive assessment system
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献38

  • 1曾小波.飞行数据误码与野值的剔除[J].飞行试验,1995,11(3):29-33. 被引量:4
  • 2吕杰,俞坚.飞行训练与评定系统简介[J].飞行力学,1996,14(3):56-60. 被引量:11
  • 3杨雪.飞行品质监控在诊断飞机相关系统故障方面的应用[J].民航科技,2007(2):148-150. 被引量:2
  • 4张世英 张文泉.技术经济预测与决策[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1994..
  • 5[7]Nebylowitsch Mike.Developing flight data moitoring systems[A].Maintaing safty into millennium;Proceedings of the Conference[C].London:London,Royal Aeronautical Society,1997.1-11.
  • 6[3]郑亚宁.DMZ98通用飞参地面处理系统[R].西安:陕西国际联机信息检索中心,1999.
  • 7Johnson N R,Rantanen E M. Objective pilot performance measurement:a literature review and taxonomy of metrics [ C ]//Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, OH : Wright State University ,2005:283 - 288.
  • 8Kasarskis P, Stehwien J, Hickox J, et al. Comparison of expert and novice scan behaviors during VFR flight[ EB/OL]. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, 2001 [ 2009-03-26 ]. http://www. humanfactors. illinois. edu/Reports&PapersPDFs/ isapol/procedol. pdf.
  • 9Martin S. Flight attitude track reconstruction using ywo AHRS units under laboratory conditions[C]//2009 IEEE Sensors Conference,2009: 675-678.
  • 10Evangelos Triantaphyllou. Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study[M]. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. 18-22.

共引文献435

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部