期刊文献+

投资决策中的短视损失规避

Myopic Loss Aversion in Investment Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 短视损失规避是行为经济学中的重要概念,涉及损失规避和心理账户两个概念,具体指如果投资者越频繁地评价其投资回报,则他们越经常改变其投资决策,在风险资产中的投入也就相应越少。短视损失规避的产生条件主要是评价周期和投资时限,影响因素包括先前投资结果、投资者经验、情境因素和其他个体因素等。未来研究需要从短视损失规避的适应性、解释领域、影响因素和干预措施等方面进一步探索。 Myopic loss aversion was an important concept in behavioral economics. It was based on two concepts: loss aversion and mental accounting, referring that the more frequently investors evaluated its return on investment, the more continually investors changed their investment decisions and the less his input in risky assets. The main conditions of myopic loss aversion were evaluation period and investment horizon. What is more, the influencing factors included investment outcome, the experience of investors,situational factors, and some individual factors. Future researches should explore its adaptability, the explanation fields, the influential factors, and intervention measures of myopic loss aversion.
出处 《心理研究》 2016年第3期3-9,共7页 Psychological Research
关键词 短视损失规避 评价周期 投资时限 投资结果 myopic loss aversion evaluation period investment horizon investment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Benartzi S, Thaler R H. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics, 1995, 110(1): 73-92.
  • 2Gneezy U, Potters J. An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quarterly Journal of Econoim- cs, 1997, 112(2): 631-645.
  • 3Thaler R H, Tversky A, Kahneman D. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experi- mental test. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(2) : 647-661.
  • 4Gneezy U, Kapteyn A, Potters J. Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment. Journal of Finance, 2003, 58(2): 821-837.
  • 5Kliger D, Levit B. Evaluation periods and asset prices: Myopic loss aversion at the financial market- place. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2009, 71(2): 361-371.
  • 6Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 1984, 39(4): 341-350.
  • 7Fellner G, Sutter M. Causes, consequences, and cures of myopic loss aversion-An experimental investigation. The Economic Journal, 2009, 119(537): 900-916.
  • 8Charness G, Gneezy U. Portfolio choice and risk atti- tudes: An experiment. Economic Inquiry, 2010, 48 (I): 133-146.
  • 9Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47 (2) : 263-291.
  • 10Samuelson P A. Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia, 1963, 98: 108-113.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Mehra R, Prescott E. The equity premium: a puzzle[ J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1985, 15: 145-161.
  • 2Reitz T. The equity risk premium: a solution[ J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22: 117-131.
  • 3Weil P. The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle [ J ]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1989, 24 : 401-421.
  • 4Constantinides G. Habit formation: a resolution of the equity premium [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 : 519-543.
  • 5Benartzi S, Thaler R. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110: 73-92.
  • 6Ang A, Bekaert G, Liu L. Why stocks may disappoint [R]. NBER Working Paper, No.7783, 2002.
  • 7Fielding D, Stracca L. Myopic loss aversion, disappointment aversion, and the equity premium puzzle [ R ].European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No. 203, 2003.
  • 8Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[ J ]. Econometrica, 1979, 47 : 263-291.
  • 9Kahneman D, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases [ M ]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部