期刊文献+

第二代药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉病变的疗效 被引量:1

Efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents in treating patients with unprotected left main coronary artery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)病变的疗效。方法接受DES治疗的ULMCA病变患者216例分为两组:F组121例,采用第一代DES治疗;S组95例,采用第二代DES治疗。术后常规服用阿司匹林100mg/d和氯吡格雷150mg/d,至少1年,随访1年。结果 ULMCA病变狭窄程度为(68.8±14.2)%。S组主要心血管不良事件发生率低于F组(5.3%vs.14.0%)(P<0.05)。S组靶血管血运重建发生率低于F组(3.2%vs.10.7%)(P<0.05)。两组术后ULMCA最小管腔直径及管腔狭窄程度均较术前改善(P<0.05)。结论与第一代DES比较,第二代DES治疗ULMCA病变具有更好的疗效和安全性。 Objective To explore the efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents(DES)in treating the patients with unprotected left main coronary artery(ULMCA).Methods A total of 216 patients with ULMCA was assigned into two groups of A(treated with first-generation DES,121cases)and B(treated with second-generation DES,95cases).Oral asprin 100 mg/d and clopidogrel150mg/d were performed at least for one year after treatment.The patients were followed up for one year.Results Stenosis of ULMCA of 216 patients was(68.8±14.2)%.During follow up of(342±23)days,the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)in group B was lower than that in group A(5.3% vs.14.0%)(P〈0.05).So did the incidence of target vessel revascularization(3.2% vs.10.7%)(P〈0.05).Compared to before,minimum lumendiameter of ULMCA and stenosis degree after treatment were improved in both groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion Compared to first-generation DES,the second-generation DES has better efficacy and safety in treating the patients with ULMCA.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2016年第11期1247-1250,共4页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 无保护左主干冠状动脉 药物洗脱支架 Unprotected left main coronary artery Drug-eluting stent
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Stone GW,Moses JW,Ellis SG,et al.Safety and efficacy of sirolimus-and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents[J].N Engl J Med,2007,356(10):998-1008.
  • 2Rasmussen K,Maeng M,Kaltoft A,et al.Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in routine clinical care(SORT OUTⅢ):a randomised controlled superiority trial[J].Lancet,2010,375(9720):1090-1099.
  • 3Mehilli J,Richardt G,Valgimigli M,et al.Zotarolimus-versus everolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,62(22):2075-2082.
  • 4Biondi-Zoccai GG,Lotrionte M,Moretti C,et al.A collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis on 1278 patients undergoing percutaneous drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease[J].Am Heart J,2008,155(2):274-283.
  • 5Park KW,Lim WH,Ahn HS,et al.Everolimus-versus sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis(results from the EXCELLENT registry)[J].Int J Cardiol,2013,168(3):2738-2744.
  • 6Kim YH,Park DW,Ahn JM,et al.Everolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.The PRECOMBAT-2(premier of randomized comparison of bypass surgery versus angioplasty using sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with left main coronary artery disease)study[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2012,5(7):708-717.
  • 7Sarno G,Lagerqvist B,Frbert O,et al.Lower risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis with unrestricted use of'newgeneration'drug-eluting stents:a report from the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry(SCAAR)[J].Eur Heart J,2012,33(5):606-613.
  • 8Naganuma T,Chieffo A,Meliga E,et al.Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery:the DELTA Registry(drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease):a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2013,6(12):1242-1249.
  • 9Bernelli C,Chieffo A,Buchanan GL,et al.New-generation drug-eluting stent experience in the percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease:the NEST registry[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2013,25(6):269-275.
  • 10Chen SL,Xu B,Han YL,et al.Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions:results from a multicenter,randomized,prospective DKCRUSH-Ⅲstudy[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(14):1482-1488.

同被引文献22

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部