期刊文献+

粪便移植治疗炎症性肠病疗效的系统评价及单个率的Meta分析 被引量:5

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease:a Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis of Single Rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 系统评价粪便移植治疗炎症性肠病的疗效与安全性,为临床实践与研究提供参考.方法 计算机检索Medline(from 1948),Embase (from 1947),Cochrane Library (for all years),Web of Science(from 1926)、CBM、CNKI,收集所有关于粪便移植治疗炎症性肠病的随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照研究、非随机实验性研究、病例对照研究、队列研究.案例系列研究等,最后检索截止2015年9月.由2名评价员按照纳入与排除标准筛选文献和提取资料,采用R软件进行Meta分析.结果 最终纳入30篇文献,包括343例患者,其中RCT研究2篇,队列研究1篇,非随机实验性研究11篇,案例或案例系列16篇.单组率的Meta分析结果显示:FMT总体有效率为79% (95% CI:0.66 ~0.93),总体缓解率为43%(95%CI:0.29 ~0.64),亚组分析显示CD患者缓解率74.00%(95% CI:0.63~ 0.88),UC患者缓解率25% (95% CI:0.15~0.42),儿童组缓解率48% (95%CI:0.21 ~1.00),成人组缓解率33% (95% CI:0.18 ~0.61),上消化道途径缓解率75% (95% CI:0.63 ~ 0.89),下消化道途径35% (95% CI:0.21 ~0.58).总体上,粪菌移植是可耐受且安全有效的,很少发生严重不良反应,最常见的不良反应分别是腹痛、腹胀、腹泻及发热.结论 当前证据显示,粪便移植治疗炎症性肠病是有效的、安全的.上述结论尚需进一步开展对照研究,尤其是RCT研究来进一步验证. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease,in order to provide reference for clinical practice and research.Methods We searched MEDLINE (from 1948),EMBASE (from 1947),Cochrane Library (for all years),Web of Science(from 1926),CBM and CNKI,and then collected all information about fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in randomized controlled trials (RCT),non-randomized experimental studies,case-control studies,cohort studies,case series reports and so on,and last search was updated on September,2015.Two reviewers screened documents and extracted information according to inclusion and exclusion criteria,and used the R software for Meta-analysis.Results Finally,30 studies,including 343 cases of patients,contained 2 RCT articles,1 cohort studies,11 non-randomized experimental studies and 16 cases or case series were selected.The results of Meta-analysis shown that total improvement rate of IBD patients with FMT treatment was 79% (95% CI:0.66-0.93) and the complete clinical remission rate was 43% (95% CI:0.29-0.64).Subgroup analysis showed that the complete remission rate of CD patients was 74.00% (95% CI:0.63-0.88) and the remission rate in CD patients was 25% (95% CI:0.15-0.42).Moreover,child remission rate was 48% (95% CI:0.21-1.00) and adult remission rate was 33% (95% CI:0.18-0.61).The remission rate of FMT treatment through upper gastrointestinal route was 75% (95% CI:0.63-0.89) and the remission rate of FMT treatment through lower gastrointestinal approach was 35% (95% CI:0.21-0.58).Overall,fecal microbiota transplantation was safe and effective,and had little side effects.The most common side effects were abdominal pain,bloating,diarrhea and fever.Conclusion Current evidence shows that fecal transplantation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease is effective and safe.Our findings still need more studies to verify in future,especially RCT.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2016年第6期118-126,共9页 Journal of Medical Research
关键词 粪便移植 炎症性肠病 单个率 META分析 Fecal microbiota transplantation Inflammatory bowel disease Single rate Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Borody TJ,Khoruts A. Fecal microbiota transplantation and emergingapplications [ J] . Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012,9(2) : 88 -96.
  • 2Dent 0. Methodological index for non - randomized studies [ J ]. ANZJ Surg, 2003,73(9) : 675 -676.
  • 3曾宪涛,庄丽萍,杨宗国,董圣杰.Meta分析系列之七:非随机实验性研究、诊断性试验及动物实验的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(6):496-499. 被引量:95
  • 4Colman RJ, Rubin DT. Fecal microbiota transplantation as therapy forinflammatory bowel disease : a systematic review and meta - analysis[J]. J Crohn's Colitis, 2014,8(12) : 1569 - 1581.
  • 5Rossen NG, Fuentes S, van der Spek MJ,et al. Findings From aRandomized Controlled Trial of Fecal Transplantation for Patients WithUlcerative Colitis [J]. Gastroenterology, 2015, 149(1): 110 - 118,e!14.
  • 6Meng-Que Xu,Hai-Long Cao,Wei-Qiang Wang,Shan Wang,Xiao-Cang Cao,Fang Yan,Bang-Mao Wang.Fecal microbiota transplantation broadening its application beyond intestinal disorders[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2015,21(1):102-111. 被引量:63
  • 7Scaldaferri F , Pecere S , Bruno G , et al. An open — label, pilot studyto assess feasibility and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in pa-tients with mild - moderate ulcerative colitis : preliminary results [ J ].Inflamma Bowel Dise,2014,20 ( Suppl 1 ) : 82 - 83.
  • 8Vermeire S , Joossens M,Verbeke K , et al. Sal922 Pilot study on thesafety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation in refractoryCrohn's disease [J]. Gastroenterology, 2012 , 142(5): S - 360.
  • 9Kunde S, Pham A, Bonczyk S, et al. Safety, tolerability, and clini-cal response after fecal transplantation in children and young adultswith ulcerative colitis [J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2013 , 56(6): 597 -601.
  • 10Kump PK , Grochenig H - P , Lackner S , et al. Alteration of intestinaldysbiosis by fecal microbiota transplantation does not induce remissionin patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis [ J ] . Inflamm BowelDis, 2013, 19(10) : 2155 -2165.

二级参考文献42

  • 1Slim K,Nini E,Forestier D,et al. Methodological index for non- randomized studies(minors):development and validation of a new instrument[J]. ANZ J Surg,2003,73(9):712-6.
  • 2Reisch JS,Tyson JE,Mize SG. Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies[J]. Pediatrics,1989,84(5):815-27.
  • 3Des Jarlais DC,Lyles C,Crepaz N,TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions:the TREND statement[J]. Am J Public Health,2004,94(3):361-6.
  • 4Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al. The development of QUADAS:a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2003,3:25.
  • 5Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Dinnes J,et al. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies[J]. Health Technol Assess,2004,8(25):iii,1-234.
  • 6Higgins JPT,Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration,2011[J]. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 7Deeks JJ,Bossuyt PM,Gatsonis C. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration,2009[J]. http://srdta.cochrmle.org.
  • 8CASP(Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)[EB/OL]. [2012-10-01]. http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-contenffuploads/2011 / 11/C ASP_Diagno stic Appraisal_Checklist_14oct 10.pdf.
  • 9Bossuyt PM,Reitsma JB,Bruns DE,et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration [J]. Ann Intern ned,2003,138(1):W1-12.
  • 10Stroke therapy academic industry roundtable(Fisher M,Chair). Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development [J]. Stroke,1999,30(12):2752-8.

共引文献174

同被引文献57

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部