摘要
《自然之死》一书自出版以来,学术界关注的焦点一直在生态女性主义理论和环境史两方面。科学史领域忽视了该书对"科学革命"的重构。该书以女性主义立场对科学编史学的修正,即对作为狭义科学编史学核心议题的科学革命及其连带科学观的重塑,应该被重新评估。此外,还有必要由《自然之死》一书在科学史领域被边缘化的原因之一,即学科"过度专业化"现象,延伸讨论学术研究的方法问题。
Since the publication of The Death of Nature, studies of the book mainly focus on the field of eeofeminism and the environmental history in academia. However, the book' s reconstruction of the scientific revolution has been ignored by the field of history of science. This article aims to re--evaluate the book's reconstruction of the scientific revolution - which is the core topic within the historiography of science in narrow sense-from the feminism standpoint, and the reconstruction of the view of science consequently. Moreover, this article analyses possible reasons why the book has been marginalized in the field of history of science and then, discuss one of the most significant reason-hyperprofessionalism in history of science. According to the discussion of the hyperprofessionalism, this article explores the methodological issues in academic research.
出处
《科学与社会》
CSSCI
2016年第2期44-54,共11页
Science and Society
关键词
女性主义科学编史学
科学革命
自然之死
过度专业化
feminist historiography of science, scientific revolution, the Death of Nature, hyperprofessionalism