期刊文献+

基于累积碳减排的社会生产环境友好性评价 被引量:1

Environment amenity evaluation of social production based on accumulated carbon reduction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于相对基期累积碳减排量所定义的环境产出概念,从"水平—结构—动态效率"三个维度改进提出了社会生产环境友好性评价指标集,应用于国际比较,分析了中欧美德日巴印7大经济体间环境生产与经济增长、技术进步和环境生产努力水平等因素的关系,指出:考察期内,各国环境技术进步水平和环境友好程度呈现趋同趋势。中美欧对经济和环境生产的政策偏好相近。中国作出的环境努力最大,环境改善最为明显。实现同等经济产出规模,中国环境产出水平高。但是,中国环境友好程度仍低。进而,对未来中国和国际碳减排行动提出了有益的政策建议。 By the concept of environment amenity that is defined based on accumulated carbon reduction compared to base period, a set of environment amenity evaluation indicators is proposed with improvement from"Level- Structure- Dynamic efficiency dimensions. These indicators are used in international comparison and analysis about environmental production and economic growth, technical progress and environmental production efforts among seven main economies. It is concluded that, during investigated period, environmental technical progress and amenity of these economies become similar; policy preference towards social production between China, EU and USA is alike; China 's taken most efforts and achieves most in environment improvement.Comparatively, China achieves higher environmental production than others on same economic output scale,however with lowest environment amenity. Further, helpful policy advice is proposed about China and international carbon reduction activities.
作者 孙睿
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期53-63,共11页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 重庆大学中央高校基本科研项目"面向低碳转型的区域社会生产环境绩效评价"(2015CDJXY)
关键词 碳减排 累积碳减排努力 环境生产 环境友好性 国际比较 carbon reduction accumulated carbon reduction efforts environmental production environmental amenity international comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1黄勤,杨小荔.我国省区生态文明建设战略比较研究——基于各地“十二五”规划的分析[J].江西社会科学,2012,32(1):82-86. 被引量:11
  • 2李利军.李艳丽.2013.环境生产要素理论研究[M].北京:科学出版社.
  • 3GROSSMAN G M,KRUEGER A B.1995.Economic Growth and the environment[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,110 (2):353-377.
  • 4PANAYOTOU.T.1997.Demystifying the environmental kuznets curve:Turning a black box into a policy tool[J].Environment and Development Economics,2 (4):465-484.
  • 5Petri Tapio.Towards a theory of decoupling:degrees of decoupling in the EU and case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001 [J].Transport Policy,2005(12):137-151.
  • 6Eco-efficiency trends in China,1978-2010:Decoupling environmental pre-ssure from economic growth [J].Ecological Indicators,2013(24):177-184.
  • 7Herman.R,Arkekani.S.A.and Ausubel.J.H.Dematerialization.In:Ausubol J.H.and Sladovich H.E,Technology and Environment [M].National Academy Press,Washington,1989:50-69.
  • 8Marina Yesiea Recalde,Carina Guzowski,Mariana Ines Zilio.Are modern economies following a sustainable energy consumption path? [J].Energy for Sustainable Development,201 4(19):151-161.
  • 9Shenggang Ren,Hongyuan Yin,XiaoHong Chert.Using LMDI to analyze the decoupling of carbon dioxide emissions by China's manufacturing industry [J].Environmental Development,2014(9):61-75.
  • 10Fredrik N.G.Andersson,Peter Karpestam.CO2 emissions and economic ac-tivity:Short-and long-run economic determinants of scale,energy intensity and carbon intensity [J].Energy Policy,2013(61):1285-1294.

共引文献45

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部