期刊文献+

性别对80岁以上高龄急性冠脉综合征患者长期预后的影响 被引量:1

Influence of gender on long-term prognosis of acute coronary syndrome in over-80-year-old patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨性别对≥80岁高龄急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者长期预后的影响。方法 连续入选解放军总医院心内科自2006年1月至2011年12月≥80岁行冠状动脉造影检查的ACS患者664例(女性占28.31%)。根据性别进行分组,对两组患者的临床资料结果进行比较分析,记录患者主要不良心脏事件(MACE),Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析性别对高龄ACS患者长期生存率的影响。Cox多因素回归分析影响长期预后的独立危险因素。结果 随访周期13~79个月(中位数28个月)。女性患者高脂血症患病率、左室射血分数、体质量指数及空腹血糖水平高于男性患者(P<0.05)。男性患者舒张压、血尿酸水平、吸烟史、慢性肾功能不全、陈旧性心肌梗死、脑卒中发病率高于女性患者(P<0.05)。两组患者的ACS临床分型、用药方案及治疗策略未见显著差异(P>0.05)。Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线分析显示, 两组患者长期生存率(P=0.619)及无事件生存率(P=0.365)均无显著差异。Cox多因素回归分析显示非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)、收缩压水平是高龄ACS患者全因死亡(HR=1.73,95%CI:1.09~2.75,P=0.019;HR=0.98,95%CI:0.97~1.00,P=0.015)和MACE发生(HR=1.80,95%CI:1.22~2.63,P=0.003;HR=0.98,95%CI:0.97~0.99,P=0.003)的独立危险因素。结论 性别不是影响高龄ACS患者长期预后的危险因素,non-HDL-C和收缩压水平是该人群的全因死亡和MACE发生的独立危险因素。 Objective To investigate the effect of gender on the long-term prognosis in the elderly acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients over 80 years old. Methods All 664 consecutive ACS octogenarians (28.31% women) admitted and undergoing coronary angiography in our department from January 2006 to December 2011 were enrolled in this study. They were assigned into male and female groups. Clinical data were collected and compared between the 2 groups. The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for the effect of gender on long-term survival in the cohort. Cox multivariate regression analysis was carried out to study the independent predictors for long-term prognosis. Results The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 79 months (median 28 months). The women had higher hyperlipidemia incidence, larger left ventricular ejection fraction, higher body mass index, and elevated fasting blood glucose than the men (P〈0.05). But diastolic blood pressure, serum uric acid, percentages of smoking history and previous myocardial infarction, and incidences of stroke and chronic renal failure were higher in the male than in the female groups (P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in clinical classification of ACS, medicine and treatment strategies between the 2 groups (P〉0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that no significant differences were observed in long-term survival (P=0.619) and event-free survival (P=0.365) between the 2 groups. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and systolic blood pressure level were independent predictors for long-term all-cause mortality (HR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.09-2.75, P=0.019; HR=0.98, 95%CI: 0.97-1.00, P=0.015) and MACE (HR=1.80, 95%CI: 1.22-2.63, P=0.003; HR=0.98, 95%CI: 0.97-0.99, P=0.003). ConclusionGender is not a risk factor for long-term prognosis in ACS octogenarians, but non-HDL-C and systolic blood pressure are independent predictors for long-term all-cause mortality and MACE.
出处 《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》 2016年第5期347-352,共6页 Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
基金 国家自然科学基金(81500269) 全军医学科技青年培育项目(14QNP104)~~
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 性别 老年人 80以上 预后 危险因素 acute coronary syndrome gender aged,80 and over prognosis clinical risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1陈伟伟,高润霖,刘力生,朱曼璐,王文,王拥军,吴兆苏,李惠君,郑哲,蒋立新,胡盛寿.《中国心血管病报告2014》概要[J].中国循环杂志,2015,30(7):617-622. 被引量:793
  • 2Newman AB, Murabito JM. The epidemiology of longevity and exceptional survival [ J ]. Epidemiol Rev, 2013, 35 ( 1 ) : 181 - 197.
  • 3Anzai A, Maekawa Y, Kodaira M, et al. Prognostic implications of optimal medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians[J].Heart Vessels, 2015, 30(2): 186- 192.
  • 4Lin CF, Shen LJ, Hsiao FY, et al. Sex differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome after percuta- neous coronary intervention: a population-based study [J]. J Women's Health (Larchmt) , 2014, 23(3): 234-244.
  • 5Hvelplund A, Galatins S, Madsen M, et al. Women with acute coronary syndrome are less invasively examined and subsequently less treated than men[J]. Eur Heart J, 2010, 31 (6) : 684 -690.
  • 6Sbarouni E, Georgiadou P, Voudris V, et al. Gender-specific differences in biomarkers responses to acute coronary syndromes and revascularization procedures [ J ]. Biomarkers, 2011, 16 ( 6 ) : 457 - 465.
  • 7Wenger NK. Gender differences in coronary risk and risk factors [ A ]// Manson JE. Prevention of Myocardial Infarction [ M ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1996 : 387 -412.
  • 8Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ ) [J]. JAMA, 2001, 285( 19): 2486-2497.
  • 9Heer T, Gitt AK, Juenger C, et al. Gender differences in acute non-ST-~gment elevation myocardial infarction[ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 98(2) : 160 - 166.
  • 10Milcent C, Dormont B, Durand-Zaleski I, et al. Gender differences in hospital mortality and use of percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: Microsimulation analysis of the 1999 nationwide French hospitals database [J]. Circulation, 2007, 115(7) : 833 -839.

共引文献792

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部