期刊文献+

紧急避险限度认定标准新论 被引量:4

The New Study of the Determination of the Necessity Limits Standard
原文传递
导出
摘要 在紧急避险限度的认定上,通过社会相当性理论导入,构建法益衡量与社会相当性判断双层认定机制,才能根本上解决紧急避险限度认定的合理性问题。就双层认定机制内部关系而言,法益衡量是基础,社会相当性判断是关键。在双层认定机制范畴内,避险行为损害的法益无论大于、等于还是小于保护的法益,只要其造成了不适当损害,在其所属的具体社会范围内缺乏通常性和必要性,且从整体法秩序立场看,也不具有规范价值上的适当性,便属于超过了必要限度要求,成立避险过当。 On the determination of the necessity limits standard, only through the introduction of social considerable theory and the construction of the dual determination mechanism which contains the lbalance of legal interest and the introduction of Social considerable theory, can solve the problem of rationality of necessity limits standard. As far as the internal relationship of the dual determination mechanism, the balance of legal interest is the basis and the introduction of social considerable theory is the key. Inside the dual determination mechanism, no matter how big the damage which the necessity leads to is, more than, equal to or less than the legal interest which is protected, as long as there exists inadequate damage which is lack of necessity in the social area that it belongs to , and in the aspect of the whole law order, if the necessity lacks of appropriateness in the degree of regulative values, it may exceed a certain limit and constitute the excessive necessity.
作者 吕梁 张云霄
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期151-162,共12页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 紧急避险 限度认定 法益衡量 社会相当性 避险过当 necessity determination of limitation balance of legal interest social considerable theory excessive necessity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

共引文献269

同被引文献38

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部