摘要
在紧急避险限度的认定上,通过社会相当性理论导入,构建法益衡量与社会相当性判断双层认定机制,才能根本上解决紧急避险限度认定的合理性问题。就双层认定机制内部关系而言,法益衡量是基础,社会相当性判断是关键。在双层认定机制范畴内,避险行为损害的法益无论大于、等于还是小于保护的法益,只要其造成了不适当损害,在其所属的具体社会范围内缺乏通常性和必要性,且从整体法秩序立场看,也不具有规范价值上的适当性,便属于超过了必要限度要求,成立避险过当。
On the determination of the necessity limits standard, only through the introduction of social considerable theory and the construction of the dual determination mechanism which contains the lbalance of legal interest and the introduction of Social considerable theory, can solve the problem of rationality of necessity limits standard. As far as the internal relationship of the dual determination mechanism, the balance of legal interest is the basis and the introduction of social considerable theory is the key. Inside the dual determination mechanism, no matter how big the damage which the necessity leads to is, more than, equal to or less than the legal interest which is protected, as long as there exists inadequate damage which is lack of necessity in the social area that it belongs to , and in the aspect of the whole law order, if the necessity lacks of appropriateness in the degree of regulative values, it may exceed a certain limit and constitute the excessive necessity.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第7期151-162,共12页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
紧急避险
限度认定
法益衡量
社会相当性
避险过当
necessity
determination of limitation
balance of legal interest
social considerable theory
excessive necessity