法律实践需求下的法教义学与社科法学:对照及反思

Legal Dogmatics and Law and Social Science among Chinese Legal Practice Demand: Comparison and Reflection

法教义学与社科法学对法律现象的不同研究范式与思路,反映出两大学术阵营与中国社会法律实践需求的紧密关系。法教义学的发展源于改革开放后中国法制建设过程中法律应用的迫切需要,并以此来保障法律的正确实施;而社科法学的兴起,则是对法教义学专注规范分析与制度建构过程中,忽视与其他社会系统间的相互影响,所给社会带来的日趋增长的成本压力的一种反思,从而告诫人们应以更加谨慎的态度去看待法律对于现实生活的介入。法教义学与社科法学在各自领域内的发展壮大,对中国法学以及其他社会学科的发展均有所贡献,但两大学术阵营在"交锋"的过程中,也不同程度上出现了一些问题。彼此间的对立与批判,并非是提升各方学术水平、影响力的有效措施,或许,更为贴近现实生活、更能有效针对法律实践需求而不断完善、发展的法学理论,方能在中国法学发展的进程中更胜一筹。

The legal domatics and law and social science＇s different research approach to legal phenomenon shows that they have a closed relation with legal practice demand in Chinese society. Legal dogmatics orients from the need of legal application in the process of legal system construction after the late of 1970s in China and keeps normal running of law. However, the rising of law and social science is a reflection to the legal domatics which neglects the interacted influence among social systems so that produce a large number of cost pressure to society. Law and social science＇s result tells us that it would be researched with cautious attitude to observe the law intervening society. The development of legal domatics and law and social science makes a contribution to Chinese law science and other social sciences, but also produces some problems. Opposed and criticized viewpoints between legal domatics and law and social science can not improve the development of law science further, perhaps the one of which can satisfy the demand of Chinese legal practice, it will become the superior in Chinese legal academy.