期刊文献+

城市青少年焦虑症状的人际易感性-应激模型:多时段追踪研究 被引量:5

Interpersonal Vulnerability to Anxious Symptoms in Adolescents:A Longitudinal Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:验证城市青少年焦虑症状的人际易感性-应激模型。方法:553名城市在校高中生在完成了包含人际易感性、焦虑症状和抑郁症状在内的首次测评后,每隔一个月完成一次负性生活事件、焦虑症状和抑郁症状的追踪测评,半年时间内共完成7次追踪测评,采用多层线性模型对数据进行分析。结果:家庭关系和应激的交互作用显著,同伴支持和应激的交互作用显著。结论:在遭遇生活事件时,家庭关系和同伴关系受损越严重的青少年,焦虑症状会加剧得更明显,支持青少年焦虑症状的人际易感性-应激模型。 Objective: To explore interpersonal vulnerability-stress model, the study examined whether impairment in peer and family relationships serves as a vulnerability factor to anxious symptoms in urban samples of adolescents from Hu- nan Province, China. Methods: At first measure, 553 adolescents completed measures assessing interpersonal vulnerabili- ty, anxious symptoms and depressive symptoms. Participants subsequently completed measures assessing anxious symp- toms, depressive symptoms and the occurrence of negative interpersonal events once a month for six months. Data were ana- lyzed using hierarchical linear modeling analyses. Results: The interaction effect of family relations and stress on adoles- cent anxious symptoms was significant; while the interaction effect of peer support and stress on adolescent anxious symp- toms was significant. Conclusion: Greater impairment in family relations and peer relations was associated with greater in- creases in anxious symptoms following negative interpersonal events, to support interpersonal vulnerability-stress model.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期488-490,494,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 青少年 家庭关系 同伴支持 应激 焦虑症状 Adolescents Family relations Peer support Stress Anxious symptoms
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献111

  • 1刘贤臣,唐茂芹,陈琨,胡蕾,王爱祯.SDS和CES-D对大学生抑郁症状评定结果的比较[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(1):19-20. 被引量:95
  • 2冯正直,张大均.中学生抑郁症状发展的性别、年龄、年级差异[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(36):32-34. 被引量:26
  • 3吴泽俊,张洪波,许娟,王君,王坚杰.女大学生焦虑、抑郁与人格特征的相关性研究[J].中国学校卫生,2007,28(3):232-234. 被引量:24
  • 4Ingram RE,Luxton DD. Vulnerability-stress models. In: Hankin BL, Abela JRZ. Development of psychopathology : A vulnerability-stress perspective. New York:Sage Publications, Ins,2005.32-46.
  • 5Kanner AD,Coyne JC ,Schaefer C ,et al. Comparison of two modes of stress measurement:Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1981,4(1) : 1-39.
  • 6Andrews G. Life event stress,social support,coping style and risk of psychological impairment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1978,166(5) : 307-316.
  • 7Chamberlain K,Zike S. The minor events approach to stress:Support for the use of daily hassles. British Journal of Psychology, 1990,81 : 469-481.
  • 8Kendler KS,Kuhn J,Prescott CA. The interrelationship of neuroticism, sex,and stressful Life Events in the prediction of episodes of Major Depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2004,161(4) :631-636.
  • 9Chien LL,Ko HC,Wu JYW. The five-factor model of personality and depressive symptoms:One-year follow-up. Personality and Individual Differences,2007,43 (5):1013- 1023.
  • 10Radloff LS. The CES-D scale:A self-reported depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measures, 1977,1:385-394.

共引文献118

同被引文献71

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部