期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开放根治性膀胱全切-回肠膀胱术疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery for radical cystectomy with ileal conduit surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜与开放根治性膀胱全切-回肠膀胱术的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我院自2011年6月至2016年1月行开放(ORC)及腹腔镜(LRC)根治性膀胱全切-回肠膀胱术62例患者的资料,其中ORC组32例,LRC组30例。对两组患者的术前基本资料、围术期数据、术后并发症情况进行对比分析。结果 LRC组较ORC组具有术中出血量少(P=0.000),住院时间短(P=0.000)的特点。所有患者术后切缘均为阴性,两组患者在淋巴结清扫个数(P=0.085)以及淋巴结阳性率(P=0.922)方面无统计学差异。两组患者在肿瘤病理分期(P=0.999),分级(P=0.878)方面无统计学差异。中位随访时间36.5个月(6~56个月),ORC组较LRC组具有术后肠梗阻发生率低(P=0.040)的特点。结论与开放手术相比,腹腔镜根治性膀胱全切-回肠膀胱术具有术中出血少、术后恢复快的特点,其术后病理学结果与开放手术疗效相当,但其术后肠梗阻发生率明显高于开放手术。考虑腹腔镜术后无法保留腹膜完整性为主要原因。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical cystectomy(LRC)and open radical cystectomy(ORC)for the treatment of ileal conduit surgery.Methods Sixty-two patients with LRC and ORC for the treatment of ileal conduit surgery from 2011 January to 2016 June were retrospectively reviewed.A total of 30 patients received LRC and ileal conduit surgery,and 32 cases of ORC were enrolled for comparison.The demographic parameters of patients,perioperative data,postoperative complication and oncology results were recorded and evaluated.Results The LRC group had less extimated blood loss(P=0.000),shorter hospital stay(P=0.000)compared with the ORC group.There was no difference in the mean number of dissected lymph nodes(P=0.085),and lymph node positive rate(P=0.922)between the two groups.There was no difference in term of tumor pathological staging classification.The median follow-up was 36.5months(6~56months).The ORC group had lower incidence of intestinal obstruction(P=0.040).Conclusion Compared with ORC,LRC has advantages of less blood loss,shorter hospital stay in the treatment of ileal conduit surgery.It produces comparable tumor control as ORC.It had higher incidence of intestinal obstruction.We believed that in the process of the laparoscopic surgery the cause is that we can't keep peritoneal integrity.
出处 《滨州医学院学报》 2016年第3期180-182,205,共4页 Journal of Binzhou Medical University
基金 滨州市科技发展计划(2014ZC0157) 滨州医学院科技计划项目(BY2014KJ38)
关键词 膀胱肿瘤 腹腔镜 回肠膀胱术 根治性膀胱切除 bladder cancer laparoscopic ileal conduit surgery radical cystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Aboumarouk O M, Hughes 0,Narahari K,et al. Safety and fea-sibility of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for the treatment ofbladder cancer[J], J Endourol,2013 ,27(9) : 1083-1095.
  • 2Kanapathy M,Patel N M, Kalaskar D M, et al. Tissue-engi-neered lymphatic graft for the treatment of lymphedema [J ]. JSurg Res, 2014,192(2):544-554.
  • 3Sanchez D B E,Gallego P J,Rechera R A, et al. Radical cystecto-my and laparoscopic ideal conduit [J]. Arch Esp Urol, 1993,46(7):621-624.
  • 4吴鑫,刘沛,朱雨泽,郑卫,唐琦,姚林,张崔建,郝瀚,李学松,周利群.腹腔镜与开放根治性膀胱全切-回肠原位新膀胱术的疗效对比[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2015,20(4):229-233. 被引量:7
  • 5Stolzenburg J U, Anderson C,Rabenalt R,et al. Endoscopic ex-traperitonenl radical prostatectomy in patients with prostatecancer and previous laparoscopic inguinal mesh placement forhernia repair[J]. World J Urol, 2005 ,23(4) : 295-299.
  • 6Jian-Cheng T,Bo Z?Jian F,et al. Delta-shaped gastroduodenosto-my in fully laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study[J]. Medicine(Baltimore) ,2015,94(28) : 1-4.
  • 7Haber G P,Crouzet S,Gill I S. Laparoscopic and robotic assistedradical cystectomy for bladder cancer:a critical analysis[J]. EurUrol,2008,54(1) :54-62.
  • 8Nova G,Catto J W,Wilson T,et al. Systematic review and cumu-lative analysis of perioperative outcomes and comloications afterrobot-assisted radical cystectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2015,67 (3):376-401.
  • 9Albisinni S, Rassweiler J, Abbou C C* et al. Long-term analysisof oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical cystectomy inEurope: Association of Urology(FAU) section of Urotechnology[J]. BJU Int,2015,115(6):937-945.
  • 10Gillitzer R,Farasaty-Ghazwiny M, Fritsch J, et al. Extraperito-neal ileal conduit[J]. BJU Int,2011,108(2) :298-301.

二级参考文献28

  • 1黄健,黄海,姚友生,谢文练,许可慰,郭正辉,江春,韩金利.腹腔镜与开放性膀胱全切原位回肠代膀胱术的疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):172-175. 被引量:54
  • 2STENZL A, COWAN N C, DE SANTIS M, et al. Treatment of musele-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: update of the EAU guidelines[J]. Eur Urol,2011,59(6) : 1009-1018.
  • 3GERHARZ E W. Is there any evidence that one continent diver- sion is any better than any other or than ileal conduit. [J]. Curr Opin Urol,2007,17(6) :402-407.
  • 4DINDO D, DEMARTINES N, CLAVIEN P A. Classification of surgieal eomplieations: a new proposal with evaluation in a eo- hort of 6336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004,240(2) :205-213.
  • 5STUDER U E, ACKERMANN D, CASANOVA G A, et aL Three years' experience with an ileal low pressure bladder substi- tute[J]. BrJ Uro1,1989,63(1):43-52.
  • 6SANCHEZ D B E, GALLEGO P J, RECHE R A, et al. [Radi- eal eystectomy and laparoseopic ileal conduit] [J]. Arch Esp Urol, 1993,46 (7) : 621-624.
  • 7YU H Y, HEVELONE N D, LIPSITZ S R, et al. Comparativeanalysis of outcomes and costs following open radical cysteetomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 6](6):1239-1244.
  • 8SIMONATO A, GREGORI A, LISSIANI A, et al. Laparoscop- ic radical cystoprostatectomy: our experience in a consecutive se- ries of 10 patients with a 3 years follow-up[J]. Eur Urol,2005, 47(6) :785-790, 790-792.
  • 9SPRINGER C, MOHAMMED N, ALBA S, et al. Laparoseopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal ileal neobladder for mus- ele-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder technique and short-term outcomes[Z]. 2014 : 32,407-412.
  • 10CATHELINEAU X, ARROYO C, ROZET F, et al. Laparo- seopic assisted radical cysteetomy: the montsouris experience al- ter 84 cases[J]. Eur Urol,2005,47(6) :780-784.

共引文献13

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部