期刊文献+

基于最大似然和支持向量机方法的遥感影像地物分类精度评估与比较研究 被引量:11

Accuracy Evaluation and Comparison of Ground Objects Classification in Remote Sensing Images Based on ML and SVM Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 遥感影像的监督分类算法在环境监测、地质调查等领域均有重要应用。本文利用最大似然(ML)分类器和支持向量机(SVM)分类器对土地利用和地表覆盖问题中地物类型的提取和识别进行研究,系统分析两种不同分类方法对地物分类结果的影响。通过选取Landsat LT5和LE7卫星遥感影像数据及定义训练样本,对比分析利用ML和SVM分类器的分类成果精度,其中Landsat LT5和ML、SVM组合的分类精度分别达94.64%和94.98%,而Landsat LE7和ML、SVM组合的分类精度则分别达97.63%和99.29%。研究表明,对于LT5影像,ML和SVM两种分类器的精度相当,而对于LE7影像,SVM分类器的精度明显高于ML分类器。 Supervised classification algorithm for remote sensing image has been significantly applied in the field of environmental monitoring and geologic survey.A comparison of Maximum Likelihood(ML)and Support Vector Machine(SVM)classifiers was conducted on extracting and recognizing the types of ground objects for land use and surface cover.The impacts of these two methods on the classification results were analyzed systematically.By selecting Landsat LT5 LE7 satellite remote sensing image and defining training samples,the classification accuracies of ML and SVM classifiers were compared.It is found that the classification accuracies of combining Landsat LT5 with ML SVM are 94.64% and 94.98%,while the classification accuracies of combining Landsat LE7 with ML SVM are 97.63% and 99.29%.The experiment results show that,for LT5 image,the accuracies of these two classifiers are almost the same,but for LE7 image,the accuracy of SVM classifier is significantly higher than that of ML classifier.
出处 《山东科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2016年第3期25-32,共8页 Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41376108 41506210) 测绘公益性行业科研专项经费资助项目(201512034) 海洋公益性行业科研专项经费资助项目(201305034) 中国博士后基金面上项目(2015M572064) 卫星测绘技术与应用国家测绘地理信息局重点实验室开放基金(KLAMTA201408) 海岛(礁)测绘技术国家测绘地理信息局重点实验室资助项目(2014A01)
关键词 分类 地物 最大似然 支持向量机 样本 classification Maximum Likelihood(ML) Support Vector Machine(SVM) sample
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1章杨清,刘政凯.利用分维向量改进神经网络在遥感模式识别中的分类精度[J].环境遥感,1994,9(1):68-72. 被引量:31
  • 2韩敏,程磊,唐晓亮.Fuzzy ARTMAP神经网络在土地覆盖分类中的应用研究[J].中国图象图形学报(A辑),2005,10(4):415-419. 被引量:11
  • 3吴健平,杨星卫.遥感数据监督分类中训练样本的纯化[J].国土资源遥感,1996,8(1):36-41. 被引量:29
  • 4舒宁 关泽群 等.遥感原理,方法和应用[M].测绘出版社,1997..
  • 5Herold M, Mueller A, Guente S, et al. Object-oriented Mapping and Analysis of Urban Land Use/Cover Using IKONOS Data[A]. Proceedings of the 22nd EARSEL Symposium[C]. Prague, Czech Republic, 2002.
  • 6Thomas M Lillesand, Ralph W Kiefer. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, lnc, 2002: 576-586.
  • 7赵瑛时,等.遥感应用分析原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
  • 8Benz U C, Peter H, Gregor W, et al. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for G/S-ready information[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 2004, (58): 239-258.
  • 9Foody, G M. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 80: 185-121.
  • 10Jeon B, Landgrebe D A. Partially Supervised Classification Using Weighted Unsupervised Clustering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999, 37(2): 1073-1079.

共引文献142

同被引文献122

引证文献11

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部