期刊文献+

谁审谁判:案件审批制度的改革路径 被引量:2

Reform of Case Approval System from the Perspective of Trial Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 案件审批制度既是阻碍法院内部独立行使审判权的主要因素,也是法院"去行政化"改革过程中难以根除的痼疾。究其原因,是法院内部审判事务管理权与审判指导监督权的异合存在以及权力主体的角色混同,造成了审判管理权与审判权关系的错位,从而导致了法院内部管理带有浓重的行政化色彩。改变这一现状的基本途径是重新设计法院内部权力结构:由法官、审判组织独立行使审判权,庭长、审判管理办公室行使审判事务管理权,主审法官主要行使审判指导监督权;同时,重构裁判文书签发制度,以保证法院内部依法独立自主行使审判权。 Case approval system is not only the major factor that impedes the internal independence of the courts,but also the malady in the process of the courts' de-administration reform.The reasons of paradoxical relationship between trial management power and jurisdiction are that trial affairs management power and trial supervision power coexist in the field of court judgment and that the roles of the power subjects are confused,which leads to the fact that internal management of courts has a strong administrative tendency.The basic way to change this situation is to redesign the court's internal power structure.In other words,jurisdiction should be independently exercised by judges and trail organizations;trial affairs management power should be exercised by the President and Trial Management Office and trial supervision power should be exercised by chief judges.Meantime,the issuing system of judgment document must be established to guarantee that the courts can exercise jurisdiction legitimately and independently.
作者 吴高庆 董琪
出处 《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第3期18-27,共10页 Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"依法独立行使审判权检察权保障机制研究"(14AZD014)
关键词 案件审批制度 去行政化 审判管理 主审法官责任制 case approval de-administration trial management the system of chief judge's responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献27

共引文献60

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部