公共政策论证类型被引量：2

The Typology of Public Policy Argument

下载PDF

导出

摘要以政策论证的民主化水平和科学化水平高、低为标准,我国存在四种公共政策论证类型:官员—自主决策式政策论证、精英—价值主导式政策论证、专家—理性判断式政策论证和多元—协商论辩式政策论证。四种类型可以通过2008年之前的经济适用房建设、怒江水电开发论争、新农合制度实施、新医改方案制定分别加以验证。每种类型既在论证民主化和科学化水平上有所不同,也有各自的适用领域。 Based on the high and low levels of democratic and scientific policy argumentation, this articledivides policy argument into four types： officials’ autonomous decision-making policy argument, elites’ valueleading policy argument, experts’ rational judgment leading policy argument, and multiple deliberation policyargument, which can be verified by construction of affordable housing（ 1998 - 2 0 0 8 ） , Nujiang River hydropowerdevelopment debate, the implementation of new rural cooperative medical system, and new medical reformprogram making respectively. The comparative study finds that each type has both different democratic andscientific argumentation levels as well as its application fields.

作者雷尚清

机构地区四川大学公共管理学院

出处《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期134-141,共8页 Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基金教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"决策论证与邻避设施社会稳定风险防范研究"(15YJC630052) 四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费学科前沿与交叉创新项目"邻避工程社会稳定风险治理:决策论证的视角"(skqy201516)

关键词政策论证论证民主化论证科学化类型学 policy argument, the democratization level of argument, the scientification level of argument,typology

分类号 D035-01 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1丘昌泰.《公共政策:基础篇》,台北:巨流图书公司,2 0 0 4 年,第2 0 6 页.
2威廉· 邓恩" 公共政策分析导论》,谢明等译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2 0 1 1 年,第2 8 6 页.
3K. B. Sm ith , " Typologies Taxonomies and the Benefits of Policy C lassification," P olicy StudiesJournal, Vol. 3 0 ,No. 3 , 2 0 0 2 , pp. 3 7 9 - 3 9 5 .
4威廉· N ·邓恩.《公共政策分析导论》,第2 6 8 页.
5DouglasTorgerson, u Power and Insight in Policy D iscourse: Post-positivism and Problem D efinition, P olicy Studies in Canada: TheState o f the Art, 1 9 9 6 , pp. 2 6 6 - 2 9 8.
6Maarten H ajer andDavid Laws, u Ordering Through D is c o u r s e ,i n M ichael M oran, MartinR ein , and Robert E. Goodin, eds., The Oxford Handbook o f Public P o licy, Oxford U niversity P ress, 2 0 0 6 , p. 2 6 0 .
7Frank F ischer, u Policy Discourse and the Politics of W ashington Think T a n k s,J, in Frank Fischer and John F orester,The Argumentative Turn in P olicy Analysis and P lan n in g, D urham : Duke University P ress, 1 9 9 3 , pp. 2 1 - 4 2 .
8Robert Hoppe, u Political Judgment and the Policy Cycle : the Case of Ethnicity Policy Arguments in the Netherlands,in Frank Fischer and John Forester, The Argumentative Turn in P olicy Analysis and P lan n in g, pp. 77 - 100.
9Bruce Jennings, "Counsel and Consensus: Norms of Argument in Health Policy," in Frank Fischer and John Forester,The Argumentative Turn in P olicy Analysis and P lan n in g, pp. 101 - 116.
10朱伟.政策制定过程中官员、专家、公众的互动模式——基于政策“类型—过程”理论框架的分析[J].南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）,2013,12(3):106-113. 被引量：9