期刊文献+

切口保护套预防开放性腹部手术后切口感染的临床效果 被引量:20

Clinical efficacy of circular wound edge protector in preventing surgical site infection following open abdominal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨切口保护套预防开放腹部手术后切口感染的有效性,分析腹部切口感染的相关危险因素,为预防开放性腹部手术部位感染提供科学依据。方法将2014年3月—2015年12月某院普通外科行开放性腹部手术的162例患者,随机分为干预组(术中使用一次性切口保护套)和对照组(常规应用无菌纱布垫对切口进行保护),比较两组患者住院时间、换药费用、切口感染情况,分析腹部切口感染的相关危险因素。结果干预组术后切口感染发病率为14.81%(12/81),低于对照组的34.57%(28/81);干预组切口甲级愈合率为86.42%,高于对照组的66.67%,差异均有统计学意义(均 P <0.05)。干预组住院期间换药费用低于对照组[(305.5±176.7)元 vs (431.6±381.4)元],差异有统计学意义(P =0.008)。多因素 logistic 回归分析提示,低蛋白血症(OR=2.88,95%CI :1.21~6.87)、BMI≥24(OR =3.11,95%CI :1.12~8.66)及出血量≥400 mL(OR =3.98,95%CI :1.36~11.64)是手术部位感染的独立危险因素,使用切口保护套是保护性因素(OR =0.24,95%CI :0.09~0.59)。结论切口保护套有效降低了开放性腹部手术部位感染发病率。 Objective To explore the efficacy of circular wound edge protector(CWEP)in preventing surgical site infection (SSI)following open abdominal surgery,analyze the related risk factors for postoperative SSI,and provide scientific basis for preventing SSI following open abdominal surgery.Methods 162 patients who underwent open abdominal surgery in a hospital from March 2014 to December 2015 were randomly divided into intervention group (used CWEP during surgery)and control group (used sterile gauze pad to protect incision).Length of hospital stay,cost of dressing change,and SSI between two groups were compared,risk factors for postoperative SSI were analyzed.Results Incidence of SSI in intervention group was lower than control group (14.81%[12/81]vs 34.57%[28/81],P 〈0.05);grade-A incision healing rate of intervention group was higher than control group(86.42% vs 66.67%,P 〈0.05).The cost of dressing change in intervention group was lower than control group([305.5 ± 176.7]yuan vs [431.6 ± 381.4 ]yuan,P = 0.008 ). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that hypoproteinemia(OR,2.88[95%CI ,1.21-6.87]),body mass index ≥24(OR,3.11[95%CI ,1.12-8.66]),and blood loss≥400 mL(OR,3.98[95%CI ,1.36- 11.64])were independent risk factors for postoperative SSI,while CWEP use was the protective factor(OR,0.24[95%CI ,0.09-0.59]).Conclusion CWEP can effectively reduce the incidence of SSI following open abdominal surgery.
出处 《中国感染控制杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第6期388-392,共5页 Chinese Journal of Infection Control
基金 广东省医学科研基金(B2013261)
关键词 切口感染 手术部位感染 切口保护 开放性腹部手术 医院感染 surgical site infection incision protection open abdominal surgery healthcare-associated infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Owens CD,Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention[J]. J Hosp Infect 2008, 70(Supp 12) : 3 - 10.
  • 2Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, et al. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality,excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,1999, 20(1l) : 725 - 730.
  • 3Aga E, Keinan-Boker L, Eithan A, et al. Surgical site infec- tions after abdominal surgery: incidence and risk factors. A prospective cohort study[J].Infecti Dis (Lond), 2015, 47 (11) :761 - 767.
  • 4医院感染诊断标准(试行)[J].中华医学杂志,2001,81(5):314-320. 被引量:5789
  • 5Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, et al. Ertapenem versus ce- fotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(25): 2640-2651.
  • 6Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 239 (5) : 599- 605.
  • 7Mihaljevic AL, Mailer TC, Kehl V,et al. Wound edge protec- tors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infec- tions: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(3) :e0121187.
  • 8NNIS System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2004,32(8) : 470 - 485.
  • 9ECDC. Annual epidemiological report on communicable disea- ses in Europe, 2010[M]. Stockholm, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2010.
  • 10Bennett-Guerrero E, Pappas TN, Kohun WA, et al. Genta-micin-collagen sponge for infection prophylaxis in colorectal surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(11) :1038 - 1049.

二级参考文献15

  • 1王红梅,张梅.普通外科手术切口感染调查与分析[J].中国感染控制杂志,2007,6(1):33-34. 被引量:48
  • 2.医院感染诊断标准(试行)[S].[S].中华人民共和国卫生部,2001.2..
  • 3Ortiz H,Armendariz P,Kreisler E,et al.Influence of rescrubbing before laparotomy closure on abdominal wound infection after colorectal cancer surgery:results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial[J].Arch Surg,2012,147(7):614-620.
  • 4Vassiliou I,Tympa A,Arkadopoulos N,et al.Total thyroidectomy as the single surgical option for benign and malignant thyroid disease:a surgical challenge[J].Arch Med Sci,2013,9(1):74-78.
  • 5Liang MK,Li LT,Avellaneda A,et al.Outcomes and predictors of incisional surgical site infection in stoma reversal[J].JAMA Surg,2013,148(2):183-189.
  • 6吴孟超,吴在德,黄家驷.外科学(上)[M].7版.人民卫生出版社,2008,473.
  • 7Arsalan A, Naqvi SB, Sabah A, et al. Resistance pattern of clinical isolates involved in surgical site infectionsEJ]. Pak J Pharm Sci, 2014, 27(1) ~97- 102.
  • 8周宏,韩方正,茅一平,康海全,郑伟.肝胆手术手术部位感染相关危险因素研究[J].中国感染控制杂志,2010,9(5):334-336. 被引量:22
  • 9暴海燕,刘晓红,刘辉,王金锁,刘芳芳.外科手术切口感染危险因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2012,22(4):720-720. 被引量:14
  • 10王桂林.术后切口感染相关因素的调查分析[J].现代临床医学,2012,38(1):43-45. 被引量:6

共引文献5810

同被引文献136

引证文献20

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部