期刊文献+

单中心单臂Ⅱ期临床研究:沙利度胺治疗一代TKI继发性耐药的晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及安全性 被引量:7

A Single-center, Single-arm Phase Ⅱ Trail:Efficacy and Safety of Thalidomide on Advanced NSCLC Patients with Secondary Drug Resistance of First Generation EGRF-TKI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察沙利度胺治疗一代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor,EGFR-TKI)继发性耐药的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法 选择2010年1月至2015年12月黄山市人民医院肿瘤科的52例非小细胞肺癌住院患者为研究对象,对经一代TKI治疗后影像学证实病情进展的患者加用沙利度胺治疗,沙利度胺睡前1小时顿服,从100 mg起,每隔3天加量50 mg,最大量300 mg,对患者的有效率、毒副反应及生存进行分析。结果 所有患者经沙利度胺治疗后,部分有效(PR)4例,病情稳定(SD)16例,有效率为7.7%,疾病控制率38.5%。所有患者均未见严重的毒副反应;经治疗后,患者无疾病进展时间(PFS)在3~44周之间,中位PFS为7周,总生存时间(OS)为52~240周,中位OS为108周。在对性别和TKI治疗后PFS分组进行比较时发现,各组之间联合治疗后PFS的差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 沙利度胺对逆转一代TKI耐药具有一定的帮助。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of thalidomide in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with secondary drug resistance to first generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKID. Methods In this study, 52 cases of non-small cell lung cancer patients were recruited from January 2010 to December 2015 in Huangshan City People' s Hospital. Thalidomide was added for the treatment of patients with imaging-confirmed disease progression after taking first generation EGFR-TKI. Thalidomide was taken at a draught from 100 mg to 300 mg with an increase of 50 mg every four days, 1 h before bedtime. The efficiency and toxicity of thalidomide and the survival of patients were analyzed. Results In all patients, there were 4 cases of partial response (PR) and 16 cases of stability of disease (SD). The effective rate was 7.7%, and the disease control rate was 38.5%. There was no serious adverse reaction in all patients. After treatment, the progress free survival (PFS) ranged between 3 weeks and 44 weeks, and the median PFS was 7 weeks. The overall survival (OS) was from 52 weeks to 240 weeks, and the median OS was 108 weeks. After thalidomide and TKI combination therapy, there was statistical difference to overall survival between subgroups (male vs. female and PFS 〈 44w vs. PFS ≥ 44w) (P〈0.05). Conclusion Thalidomide is helpful in a certain extent to the reversal of first generation TK1 resistance.
出处 《肿瘤药学》 CAS 2016年第3期193-197,共5页 Anti-Tumor Pharmacy
基金 黄山市科技局科技攻关课题(2013KN-01)
关键词 沙利度胺 表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 非小细胞肺癌 贝伐单抗 厄洛替尼 Thalidomide Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhihitors Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Bevacizumab Erlotinib
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 20 I O. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300. doi: 10.3322!caac.20073.
  • 2Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med 1996;335:91-7. doi: I0.1056!NEJMI99607113350204.
  • 3Child JA, Morgan OJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1875-83. doi: 10.1056!NEJMoa022340.
  • 4Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, Merla E, Capparella V, Callea V, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:825-31. doi: 10.1016!SOI40-6736(06)68338-4.
  • 5Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, Fonseca R, Greipp PR; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:431-6. doi: I0.1200!JCO.2005.03.0221.
  • 6Hicks LK, Haynes AE, Reece DE, Walker IR, Herst JA, Meyer RM, et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of thalidomide for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. Cancer Treat Rev 2008;34:442-52. doi: 10. 1016.ctrv. 2008.02.003.
  • 7Kumar A, Hozo I, Wheatley K, Djulbegovic B. Thalidomide versus bortezomib based regimens as first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: A systematic review. Am J Hematol 2011;86:18-24. doi: 10.1002!ajh.21904.
  • 8Kapoor P, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dingli D, et al. Melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide for elderly and/or transplant ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis. Leukemia 2011;25:689-96. doi: I0.1038!leu.2010.313.
  • 9Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2007;8:16. doi: 10.118611 745-6215-8-16.
  • 10Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12. doi: 10.1016!0197-2456(95)00134-4.

共引文献5

同被引文献60

引证文献7

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部