期刊文献+

疤痕子宫再次分娩78例临床分析 被引量:1

Clinical Analysis of 78 Cases with Uterine Scar Re-pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨疤痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的安全性。方法整群选取2015年6月—2016年2月笔者援助的非洲桑给巴尔奔巴地区Abdalla Mzee医院疤痕子宫产妇78例的临床资料,分析疤痕子宫足月分娩方式的选择。结果 178例孕妇中有35例行阴道试产,试产率为44.87%(35/78),成功阴道分娩的31例,试产成功率为88.57%(31/35),4例因产程停滞行剖宫产,剖宫产率为60.26%(47/78),其中1例因子宫破裂行剖宫产。2既往有阴道分娩史的孕妇阴道试产率及阴道分娩率均明显高于无阴道分娩史者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);3阴道分娩组及剖宫产组孕妇在年龄、孕周、新生儿窒息发生率、产褥感染方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);阴道分娩组产后2 h出血量、新生儿出生体重均明显低于剖宫产组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论对符合试产条件的疤痕子宫给予阴道试产是可行的,但须严密观察产程进展,同时做好急诊手术准备。 Objective To discuss the safety of uterine scar re-pregnancy vaginal delivery. Methods The clinical data of 78 cases of delivery women with uterine scar in Abdalla Mzee hospital in Zanzibar Pemba area in Africa assisted by the writer from June 2015 to February 2016 were selected, and the choice of uterine scar full-term delivery methods was analyzed.Results 1Of the 78 cases of delivery women, 35 cases received vaginal trial production, and the trial production rate was44.87%(35/78), successful vaginal delivery occurred to 31 cases, and the trial production success rate was 88.57%(31/35),4 cases received caesarean section due to arrested labor, and the caesarean section rate was 60.26%(47/78), and 1 case received caesarean section due to uterine rupture. 2 The vaginal trial production rate and vaginal delivery rate in patients with vaginal delivery history were obviously higher than those in patients without vaginal delivery history, and the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.01). 3The differences in the age, pregnant week, incidence rate of asphyxia neonatorum and puerperal infection between the vaginal delivery group and the caesarean section group had no statistical significance( P〉0.05), the blood loss in postpartum 2 hours and neonatal birth weight in the vaginal delivery group were obviously lower than those in the caesarean section group, and the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.01). Conclusion Vaginal trial production is feasible for the uterine scar meeting the trial production conditions, but we must closely observe the development of the delivery process, and make good preparation for the emergency operation at the same time.
作者 郁春晴
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第14期35-37,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 疤痕子宫 剖宫产术后阴道试产 剖宫产术后阴道分娩 Uterine scar Vaginal trial production after cesarean section Vaginal delivery after cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Malede Birara,Yirgu Gebrehiwot.Forctors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section(VBAC)at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa,Ethiopia:a case control study[J].BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,2013,13:31.
  • 2张波,邬龙英.241例瘢痕子宫产妇阴道分娩病例分析[J].江西医药,2015,50(12):1460-1461. 被引量:2
  • 3魏淑燕.350例剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩结局的分析[J].中国当代医药,2015,22(32):77-80. 被引量:6
  • 4周丽屏,Zubeir TS,Hamida SA.非洲桑给巴尔奔巴地区剖宫产指征及原因分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,5(3):66-69. 被引量:1
  • 5Bhide A,Caric V,Arulkuman S.Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery[J]Int Gynaecol Obstet.2016,S0020-7292(16):53-59.
  • 6Balachandran L,Vaswani P,Mogotlane R.Pregnancy outcome in woman with previus one cesarean section[J].J Clin Res,2014,8(2):99-102.
  • 7Eden KB,Mc Donagh M,Denman MA,et al.New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean:can it be predicted[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116:967-981.
  • 8Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Birth after previous caesarean birth[R].Greeen-top Guideline NO45,2015,10(45):1-31.
  • 9Leung AS,Leung EK,Paul RH.Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery:maternal and fatal consequences[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1993,169(4):945-950.
  • 10胡芷洋,苏放明.剖宫产后再次妊娠的阴道分娩预测[J].中华产科急救电子杂志,2013,2(4):28-32. 被引量:7

二级参考文献76

  • 1陆再英,钟南山.内科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2008:251.
  • 2狄文,马丁.妇产科学(双语版)[M].第1版.北京:科学出版社,2006:172.
  • 3Betrain AP,Merialdi M,Lauer JA,etal. Rates of caesarean section:analysis of global, regional and national estimates [ J ]. PaediatrPerinat Epidemiol,2007 ,21(2) :98.
  • 4Souza JP,Papinelli MA,Amaral E,et al. Obstetric care and severepregnancy complications in Latin America and the Caribbean : ananalysis of information from demographic health surveys [ J ]. RevPanam Salud Publica,2007 ,21(6) :396.
  • 5Oufedraogo S,Koura GK,Bodeau - Livinec F,et al. Maternal anemiain pregnancy : assessing the effect of routine preventive measures in amalaria - endemic area [ J ]. Am J Trap Med Hyg, 2013 , 88 ( 2 ):292 -300.
  • 6Kullima AA, Audu BM,Geidam AD. Outcome of twin deliveries atthe University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital: a 5 — year review[J]. Niger J Clin Pract,2011,14(3) :345 -348.
  • 7Kamil A, Perveen K, Al - Tannir MA. Factors associated withcesarean deliveries at Women Specialized Hospital Riyadh,KingFahd Medical City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [ J ]. J Egypt PublicHealth Assoc,2011,86(3 -4) :73 -76.
  • 8Geidam AD. Audu BM, Kawuwa BM, Obed JY. Rising trend andindications of caesarean section at the university of Maiduguriteaching hospital,Nigeria[ J]. Ann Afr Med,2009,8(2) :127 -132.
  • 9Festin MR, Laopaiboon M, Pattanittum P, et al. Caesarean sectionin four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associatedcare practices and health outcomes [ J]. BMC PregnancyChildbirth,2009,9(9):17.
  • 10Feng XL,Xu L,Guo Y,Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008[J].{H}Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2012,(01):30-39,39A.

共引文献12

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部