期刊文献+

非对称信息下考虑企业社会责任的供应链决策 被引量:3

Supply chain decisions under asymmetric information considering corporate social responsibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对由单个制造商和单个零售商组成的两级Stackelberg博弈供应链,文章通过消费者剩余作为其参与企业社会责任(corporate social responsibility,CSR)活动的利润函数,研究了非对称信息下零售商参与CSR和制造商参与CSR活动供应链最优决策。首先,在零售商参与CSR活动下,讨论了市场潜力均值ea和参与CSR活动投入系数对αr零售价、批发价、市场需求量、零售商利润、制造商利润和系统总利润的影响,且分析了在不同的取值范围的市场潜力均值ea下,系统总利润达到最大时活动投入系数α*r最优值。其次,在制造商参与CSR活动下,讨论了市场潜力均值ea和参与CSR活动投入系数αm对以上决策变量的影响,同样考察了在不同的取值范围下的市场潜力均值ea下,系统总利润达到最大时活动投入系数α*m最优值。最后,通过数值仿真验证了以上结论。 The two-stage Stackelberg game supply chain consists of a single manufacturer and a single retailer .Under asymmetric information ,the optimal decisions for the retailer and the manufacturer of supply chain involving in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are studied ,which introduce consumer surplus as a profit function of their participation .Firstly ,the effect of the market potential mean ea and the activity input coefficients αr on the retail price ,the wholesale price ,the market de-mand ,the retailer is profit ,the manufacturer profit and system total profit is discussed as the retailer is involved in CSR activities .Moreover ,the optimal activity input coefficient αr for the biggest system*total profit is analyzed at different range of the market potential mean ea .Then as the manufacturer is involved in CSR activities ,the effect of the market potential mean ea and the CSR activity input coeffi-cient αm on the decision variables above is investigated .The optimal activity input coefficient αm for the*biggest system total profit is also analyzed at different range of the market potential mean ea .Finally , the conclusions are verified by graphical simulations .
作者 刘桂庆 周静
出处 《合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期859-864,共6页 Journal of Hefei University of Technology:Natural Science
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20120111120013)
关键词 非对称信息 CSR 供应链 消费者剩余 活动投入系数 STACKELBERG 博弈 asymmetric information corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the supply chain con-sumer surplus activity input coefficient Stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Sheldon O. The philosophy of management [M]. London: Sir Issaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd, 1924 : 50- 180.
  • 2Ni D,Li K W. A game-theoretic analysis of social responsi- bility conduct in two-echelon supply chains [J]. Int J Pro- duction Economics, 2012,138 : 303- 313.
  • 3Panda S. Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2014, 67: 92- 104.
  • 4Hsueh C. Improving corporate social responsibility in a sup- ply chain through a new revenue sharing contract[J]. Gen- eral Information,2014,151(3) :214-222.
  • 5Jose M C, Tina W. Multiperiod effects of corporate social responsibility on supply chain networks, transaction costs, emissions,and risk[J]. Int J Production Economics, 2008, 116:61-74.
  • 6Kogg B, Mont O. Environmental and social responsibility in supply chains:the practice of choice and inter-organizational management [J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 83: 154-163.
  • 7郎艳怀.非对称信息和弹性需求下的供应链激励机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(5):106-111. 被引量:26
  • 8张翠华,任金玉,于海斌.非对称信息下基于惩罚和奖励的供应链协同机制[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3):32-37. 被引量:27
  • 9周建中,陈秀宏.非对称信息下市场需求与生产成本同时发生扰动时的供应链决策[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(3):61-70. 被引量:13

二级参考文献41

共引文献61

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部