期刊文献+

重组赖脯胰岛素与赖脯胰岛素治疗T2DM的疗效比较 被引量:7

A comparison of effects between recombinant insulin lispro and insulin lispro in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨重组赖脯胰岛素注射液与赖脯胰岛素注射液在2型糖尿病(T2DM)治疗中的临床疗效和安全性。方法将血糖控制不佳的T2DM患者48例按2∶1比例随机分为重组赖脯胰岛素组(观察组,n=32)和赖脯胰岛素组(对照组,n=16),在睡前给予1次重组甘精胰岛素注射的基础上,三餐前分别给两组患者进行1次重组赖脯胰岛素或赖脯胰岛素注射,治疗周期16周。比较两组患者治疗前、后糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2h血糖(2hPG)变化水平,并评估不良事件。结果 44例完成研究,其中观察组28例,对照组16例。治疗16周后,两组患者HbA1c、FPG和2hPG水平均明显降低(P<0.05),观察组和对照组HbA1c下降幅度分别为(1.55±1.50)%、(1.06±1.30)%,FPG下降幅度分别为(2.07±5.01)、(1.09±3.18)mmol/L,2hPG下降幅度分别为(3.28±5.71)、(3.60±5.89)mmol/L。以HbA1c为主要评价指标,0.40为非劣效界值,重组赖脯胰岛素注射液非劣效于赖脯胰岛素注射液(P<0.05)。观察组HbA1c≤6.50%的达标率为14.29%,HbA1c<7.00%的达标率为28.57%;对照组HbA1c≤6.50%的达标率为18.75%,HbA1c<7.00%的达标率为43.75%,两组患者在HbA1c两个水平达标率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论重组赖脯胰岛素注射液治疗T2DM患者在有效性方面非劣效于赖脯胰岛素注射液,且具有相同的安全性。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant insulin lispro and insulin lispro in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM ) .Methods Forty‐eight T2DM patients with poor blood glucose control were randomly assigned to the recombinant insulin lispro group (observation group ,n=32) and insulin lispro group (control group ,n=16) according to the ratio of 2∶1 .On the basis of injection of the recombinant insulin glargine once daily before sleep ,the two groups were given the re‐combinant insulin lispro injection or insulin lispro injection once before each meal .The period of treatment was 16 weeks .The levels of HbA1c ,2 h postprandial blood glucose(2hPG) and fasting plasma glucose(FPG) before and after treatment were measured and compared between the two groups .The adverse events were evaluated at the end of treatment .Results Forty‐four cases finished the study ,28 cases in the observation group and 16 cases in the control group .The levels of HbA1c ,FPG and 2hPG after 16‐week treatment in the two groups were decreased significantly (P〈0 .05) .The decrease amplitudes of HbA1c in the observation group and the control group were (1 .55 ± 1 .50)% and(1 .06 ± 1 .30)% respectively ,which of FPG were (2 .07 ± 5 .01)mmol/L and (1 .09 ± 3 .18)mmol/L respectively ,and which of 2hPG declined (3 .28 ± 5 .71)mmol/L and(3 .60 ± 5 .89)mmol/L respectively . With HbA1c as the main evaluation index and 0 .40 as the non‐inferiority critical value ,non‐inferiority was found in the recombi‐nant insulin lispro injection as compared with the insulin lispro injection (P〈0 .05) .The standard‐reaching rate of HbA1c less than 6 .50% in observation group was 14 .29% ,and which of HbA1c less than 7 .00% was 28 .57% ;in control group ,these two stand‐ard‐reaching rates were 18 .75% and 43 .75% respectively ,and there were no statistically significant differences between two groups (P〉0 .05) .Conclusion The recombinant insulin lispro injection has non‐inferiority effects in the aspect of effectiveness compared with the lispro insulin injection ,moreover they have the same safety .
作者 乔旭霞 徐成
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第18期2518-2521,共4页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 糖尿病 2型 重组赖脯胰岛素 治疗结果 安全性 recombinant insulin lispro treatment outcome safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Yang WY, Lu J M, Weng J P, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China[J]. N Engl J Med,2010, 362(12) .. 1090-1101.
  • 2Xu Y,Wang LM, He J, et al. Prevalence and control of di- abetes in Chinese adultsEJ]. JAMA, 2013,310 (9) .. 948 958.
  • 3Wright A, Burden AC, Paisey RB, et al. Sulfonylurea inad- equacy:efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in pa- tients with type 2 diabetes in the U. K. Prospective Diahetes Study (UKPDS 57) [J]. Diabetes Care, 2002,25 (2) : 330-336.
  • 4Cameron CG, Bennett HA, Cosveffectiveness of insulin ana- logues for diabetes mellitusI-J~. CMAJ, 2009,180 (4) : 400- 407.
  • 5Jia W, Xiao X,Ji Q, et al. Comparison of thrice-daily premixed insulin (insulin lispro premix) with basal bolus (insulin glargine once-daily plus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro) therapy in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insuffi- ciently controlled with twice-daily premixed insulin; an open- label,randomised,controlled trial[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endo- crinol, 2015,3 (4) : 254-262.
  • 6Thrasher J, Bhargava A, Rees TM, et al. Insulin lispro with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is safe and effec- tive in patients with type 2 diabetes:a randomized cross- over trial of insulin lispro versus insulin aspartFJ~. Endocr Pract,2015,21(3) :247-257.
  • 7Rees TM, Curtis BH, Gaskins KA, et al. Efficacy and safety of insulin lispro in obese patients with type 2 dia- betes:a retrospective metaanalysis of 7 randomized con- trolled trials[J]. Endocr Pract, 2014,20(5) : 389-398.
  • 8张丽蓉,潘晓平,陈卫中,唐甜甜.用SAS编程进行定量资料的等效检验[J].现代预防医学,2008,35(7):1214-1215. 被引量:5
  • 9张新佶,贺江南,任建玲,吴美京,谢之辉,贺佳.阳性药对照临床试验中非劣效性检验的统计分析方法及相关问题[J].数理统计与管理,2010,29(2):372-379. 被引量:3
  • 10Janikiewicz J, Hanzelka K, Kozinski K, et al. Islet 13-cell failure in type 2 diabetes--Within the network of toxic lip- ids[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2015, 460 (3): 491 496.

二级参考文献26

  • 1黄圣凯,韩可勤.生物等效性评价的几种统计方法[J].中国临床药理学杂志,1993,9(1):43-46. 被引量:125
  • 2姚晨,刘玉秀.临床试验确证疗效时应注意的统计学问题[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(3):242-245. 被引量:11
  • 3World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [J]. American Medical Association, 2000, 284(2): 3043-3045.
  • 4Wang S J, Hung HMJ, Tsong Y. Utility and pitfall of some statistical methods in active-controlled clinical trials [J]. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2002, 23(1): 15-28.
  • 5International Conference on Harmonization Guidance E10, Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials [S].
  • 6CPMP/EWP/215/99 draft, CPMP Points to Consider on choice of noninferiority margin [S].
  • 7Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy Ⅰ: prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients [J]. British Medical Journal, 1994, 308(6921): 81-106.
  • 8Diamond G A, Kaul S. An Orwellian Discourse on the Meaning and Measurement of Noninferiority [J]. American Journal of Cardiology, 2007, 99(2): 284-287.
  • 9Hasselblad V, Kong D F. Statistical methods for comparison to placebo in active-control trials [J]. Drug Information Journal, 2001, 35(2): 435-449.
  • 10Temple R, Ellenberg S S. Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 1: ethical and scientific issues [J]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2000, 133(6): 455-463.

共引文献6

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部