期刊文献+

权力崇拜情结的社会心理分析 被引量:2

Social and Psychological Analysis of the Complex of Power Worship
下载PDF
导出
摘要 权力崇拜和人的其他崇拜一样,是社会历史的文化的心理的积淀,从社会心理学角度分析,权力崇拜首先是社会心理动机驱动的结果,权力的物欲化动机、控制性动机及成就动机成为个体权力崇拜的内在张力;它直接造成了构建人格的自我的弱化,并导致个体在认知上产生对权力的刻板印象;因此突出自我塑造,强化现代社会的创新意识、竞争意识,才能够消除权力崇拜情结。 As the other worship, the worship of power is the accumulation of social and historical cultural psychology. From the perspective of social psychology analysis, power worship is first the result of social psychology driving. Material motivation, control motivation and achievement motivation of the power form inherent tension of individual fight worship. It is the direct cause of weakening self construction of personality, and leads to the stereotype of power of individual cognition ; therefore, highlighting self shaping and strengthening modem society innovation consciousness, competition consciousness can eliminate the power worship complex.
作者 刘召客
出处 《安徽行政学院学报》 2016年第3期10-13,共4页 Journal of Anhui Academy of Governance
关键词 权力 崇拜情结 社会心理 power worship complex social psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献60

  • 1韦庆旺.(2008).权力差异和社会动机对谈判行为和结果的影响.博士学位论文.浙江大学.
  • 2Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
  • 3Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
  • 4Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462--479.
  • 5Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
  • 6Berdahl, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497-509.
  • 7Carver, C. S., Sutton, $. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
  • 8Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.
  • 9Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-40.
  • 10Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory Control: A generative force behind power's far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502-508.

共引文献139

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部